|
Arithmetic issues
Michael Sperber
(18 Oct 2005 06:03 UTC)
|
|
Re: Arithmetic issues
felix winkelmann
(18 Oct 2005 07:00 UTC)
|
|
Re: Arithmetic issues
John.Cowan
(18 Oct 2005 17:36 UTC)
|
|
Re: Arithmetic issues
Aubrey Jaffer
(19 Oct 2005 18:13 UTC)
|
|
Re: Arithmetic issues
John.Cowan
(19 Oct 2005 18:21 UTC)
|
|
Re: Arithmetic issues
bear
(18 Oct 2005 19:52 UTC)
|
|
Re: Arithmetic issues
John.Cowan
(18 Oct 2005 21:12 UTC)
|
|
Re: Arithmetic issues
bear
(19 Oct 2005 02:13 UTC)
|
|
Re: Arithmetic issues
John.Cowan
(19 Oct 2005 02:19 UTC)
|
|
Re: Arithmetic issues
bear
(19 Oct 2005 03:23 UTC)
|
|
Re: Arithmetic issues
Andre van Tonder
(19 Oct 2005 11:47 UTC)
|
|
Re: Arithmetic issues
Aubrey Jaffer
(19 Oct 2005 14:14 UTC)
|
|
Re: Arithmetic issues Andre van Tonder (19 Oct 2005 16:00 UTC)
|
Re: Arithmetic issues Andre van Tonder 19 Oct 2005 15:59 UTC
On Wed, 19 Oct 2005, Aubrey Jaffer wrote: > | From: Andre van Tonder <xxxxxx@now.het.brown.edu> > | > | I share the discomfort with the bitwise operations. As far as I > | can tell, the SRFI does not portably specify the value of > | (BITWISE-NOT 42). > > SRFI-60 "Integers as Bits" defines the bitwise operations for all > integers. And the reference implementation is written portably in > R5RS Scheme. > > (BITWISE-NOT 42) ==> -43 Oops, sorry. My mistake... Andre