|
My comments
Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
(19 Oct 2005 18:37 UTC)
|
|
Re: My comments
Bradd W. Szonye
(19 Oct 2005 19:17 UTC)
|
|
Re: My comments
Thomas Bushnell BSG
(19 Oct 2005 19:44 UTC)
|
|
Re: My comments
Bradd W. Szonye
(19 Oct 2005 19:55 UTC)
|
|
Re: My comments
Thomas Bushnell BSG
(19 Oct 2005 20:11 UTC)
|
|
Re: My comments
John.Cowan
(19 Oct 2005 20:10 UTC)
|
|
Re: My comments
Thomas Bushnell BSG
(19 Oct 2005 20:13 UTC)
|
|
Re: My comments
Bradd W. Szonye
(19 Oct 2005 20:25 UTC)
|
|
Re: My comments
Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
(19 Oct 2005 20:23 UTC)
|
|
Re: My comments
Bradd W. Szonye
(19 Oct 2005 20:36 UTC)
|
|
Re: My comments
Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
(19 Oct 2005 21:36 UTC)
|
|
Re: My comments
Bradd W. Szonye
(19 Oct 2005 21:42 UTC)
|
|
Re: My comments
Bradd W. Szonye
(19 Oct 2005 22:08 UTC)
|
|
Exactness (was Re: My comments)
bear
(20 Oct 2005 01:50 UTC)
|
|
Re: Exactness
Thomas Bushnell BSG
(20 Oct 2005 03:45 UTC)
|
|
Re: Exactness
Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
(20 Oct 2005 09:13 UTC)
|
|
Re: Exactness
Bradd W. Szonye
(20 Oct 2005 20:15 UTC)
|
|
Re: Exactness
bear
(20 Oct 2005 22:09 UTC)
|
|
Re: Exactness
Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
(21 Oct 2005 02:08 UTC)
|
|
Re: Exactness
Thomas Bushnell BSG
(21 Oct 2005 03:05 UTC)
|
|
Re: Exactness
Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
(21 Oct 2005 08:15 UTC)
|
|
Re: Exactness
Thomas Bushnell BSG
(21 Oct 2005 18:38 UTC)
|
|
Re: Exactness
Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
(21 Oct 2005 20:12 UTC)
|
|
Re: Exactness
Thomas Bushnell BSG
(21 Oct 2005 20:29 UTC)
|
|
Re: Exactness
Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
(21 Oct 2005 20:38 UTC)
|
|
Re: Exactness
Thomas Bushnell BSG
(21 Oct 2005 20:44 UTC)
|
|
Re: Exactness
Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
(21 Oct 2005 21:20 UTC)
|
|
Re: Exactness
Thomas Bushnell BSG
(21 Oct 2005 21:44 UTC)
|
|
Re: Exactness
Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
(21 Oct 2005 22:18 UTC)
|
|
Re: Exactness
Thomas Bushnell BSG
(21 Oct 2005 22:48 UTC)
|
|
Re: Exactness
Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
(22 Oct 2005 00:34 UTC)
|
|
Re: Exactness
Thomas Bushnell BSG
(22 Oct 2005 01:02 UTC)
|
|
Re: Exactness Per Bothner (22 Oct 2005 00:59 UTC)
|
Re: Exactness Per Bothner 22 Oct 2005 00:58 UTC
Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk wrote:
> Any existing implementation uses any other representation by default
> than fixnums/bignums,
Well, the fixnum/bignum distinction is a bit more complicated in Kawa.
Kawa has:
* array-based bignums: a (reference to a) gnu.math.IntNum, one of whose
fields is a reference to an array of 32-bits ints ("words").
* "small" bignums: if there is just a single word, it is stored
directly in te gnu.math.IntNum, and the array field is null.
* "cached" bignums: there is a table of pre-allocated gnu.math.IntNum
objects, representing -100..1024.
In addition, Kawa can work with unboxed Java byte/short/int/long.
--
--Per Bothner
xxxxxx@bothner.com http://per.bothner.com/