On Wed, 17 May 2006, Jonathan S. Shapiro wrote:

>I would like to propose that there should be some unique top-level
>module name that is reserved for use by the implementation.
>
>I am inclined to suggest that an appropriate name for this top-level
>module might be "SCHEME-RUNTIME", but I am not stuck on any particular
>name.
>

This is such a good idea, I think it should be done twice!
My proposals are "R6RS" which "SCHEME-RUNTIME" can be an alias
for, and then each implementation should have another top-level
module that they can pick their own name for, where all their
extensions to R6RS live.

				Bear