|
Prefix, not postfix
Jorgen Schaefer
(11 Apr 2006 19:24 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: Prefix, not postfix Per Bothner (11 Apr 2006 19:54 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: Prefix, not postfix
Marc Feeley
(11 Apr 2006 21:18 UTC)
|
||
|
(missing)
|
||
|
(missing)
|
||
|
(missing)
|
||
|
Re: Prefix, not postfix
Ed Watkeys
(13 Apr 2006 03:00 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: Prefix, not postfix
Donovan Kolbly
(11 Apr 2006 21:27 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: Prefix, not postfix
John Cowan
(11 Apr 2006 21:35 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: Prefix, not postfix
Jorgen Schaefer
(11 Apr 2006 21:43 UTC)
|
||
Re: Prefix, not postfix Per Bothner 11 Apr 2006 19:54 UTC
Jorgen Schaefer wrote: > The ":foo" syntax has precedence in many Scheme implementations, > as stated in the SRFI itself. The "foo:" syntax also has precedence. I know for certain of DSSSL and Kawa, but I'm sure there are others. Obviously, I prefer the "foo:" syntax. -- --Per Bothner xxxxxx@bothner.com http://per.bothner.com/