Re: Why are byte ports "ports" as such?
Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk 21 May 2006 15:54 UTC
"Jonathan S. Shapiro" <xxxxxx@eros-os.org> writes:
> 1. The correct primitive is READ-CODEPOINT, not READ-CHAR.
> READ-CHAR is a library routine.
Unless char is defined to be a code point. Which is IMHO the most
reasonable choice: code points are the natural atomic units of Unicode
text, and most Unicode algorithms are expressed in terms of code points.
--
__("< Marcin Kowalczyk
\__/ xxxxxx@knm.org.pl
^^ http://qrnik.knm.org.pl/~qrczak/