Re: Why are byte ports "ports" as such? | Simplelists

Why are byte ports "ports" as such? Ben Goetter (13 Apr 2006 17:54 UTC)

Re: Why are byte ports "ports" as such? John Cowan (13 Apr 2006 18:04 UTC)

Re: Why are byte ports "ports" as such? Marc Feeley (13 Apr 2006 21:41 UTC)

Re: Why are byte ports "ports" as such? John Cowan (14 Apr 2006 12:49 UTC)

Re: Why are byte ports "ports" as such? Marc Feeley (14 Apr 2006 13:37 UTC)

Re: Why are byte ports "ports" as such? Marc Feeley (13 Apr 2006 22:03 UTC)

Re: Why are byte ports "ports" as such? Ben Goetter (14 Apr 2006 01:02 UTC)

Re: Why are byte ports "ports" as such? Marc Feeley (14 Apr 2006 01:52 UTC)

(missing)

(missing)

(missing)

(missing)

(missing)

(missing)

(missing)

(missing)

(missing)

(missing)

(missing)

(missing)

(missing)

(missing)

(missing)

(missing)

(missing)

(missing)

Re: Why are byte ports "ports" as such? John Cowan (24 May 2006 16:06 UTC)

(missing)

(missing)

Re: Why are byte ports "ports" as such? Thomas Bushnell BSG (24 May 2006 16:26 UTC)

Re: Why are byte ports "ports" as such? John Cowan (24 May 2006 17:18 UTC)

Re: Why are byte ports "ports" as such? Marc Feeley (24 May 2006 18:11 UTC)

(missing)

(missing)

Re: Why are byte ports "ports" as such? Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk (24 May 2006 16:17 UTC)

Re: Why are byte ports "ports" as such? John Cowan (14 Apr 2006 12:26 UTC)

Re: Why are byte ports "ports" as such? Marc Feeley 24 May 2006 18:10 UTC

This discussion thread on Unicode does not belong here.  If you wish
to discuss Unicode issues and contribute to the R6RS Unicode design,
please move the discussion to the SRFI 75 list.

Marc Feeley