SRFI 97 omits to give SRFI 37 a canonical name because of the former's claim that the latter does not specify a library.

In the context of SRFI 97, this claim is erroneous. In fact, SRFI 37 defines a library with a single export named `args-fold`. Following the naming convention of SRFI 97, it should have therefore been given the name `(srfi :37 args-fold)`.

I want to suggest adding an erratum/PFN to SRFI 97 accordingly.

Thanks,

Marc