Thank you for the email, Will.  I apologize for this SRFI going
unattended so long.

I will change the naming convention to be compliant with R6RS since
several implementors have expressed the importance of this; the naming
convention is of little use without wide adoption.

Among the workarounds, I have no strong preference.  I will go with
(srfi :n) unless I hear different preferences from implementors.

David