I have revised the SRFI Libraries draft to incorporate the comments I
have received so far during the discussion period.  The significant
changes are:

    - use of (srfi :n) instead of (srfi n)
    - specification of export levels for R6RS-compatible systems
    - removal of any mention of a reference implementation

Other changes include further discussion and rationale for the design
choices made, typo corrections, etc.

The draft period has been extended another month, which I hope is more
than enough time to resolve any remaining issues.

    http://srfi.schemers.org/srfi-97/

Please send further comments, either privately to me or publicly to the
discussion list.

David