Re: Reference implementation's use of datum->syntax is not portable William D Clinger 12 Aug 2008 15:14 UTC
Re: Reference implementation's use of datum->syntax is not portable Physics 12 Aug 2008 15:33 UTC

Re: Reference implementation's use of datum->syntax is not portable William D Clinger 12 Aug 2008 15:14 UTC

Derick Eddington wrote:
> The syntax object #'define-record-type-helper in the
> below makes the list not be a datum value.  This prevents
> the reference implementation from working in PLT Scheme
> and Ikarus.

Sorry about that.  A corrected reference implementation,
with the naming convention proposed by the current draft
SRFI 97, is online at

    http://www.ccs.neu.edu/home/will/R6RS/srfi-99.sps

That implementation has been tested in PLT Scheme and in
Larceny.

Will