Ray Blaak wrote:
> Ray Blaak wrote:
>> I am ignorant of some of the passed record systems referenced, so
>> "rtd" does not seem obvious to me. "Record Type Data"?
> Ok:
> <definition>            -> <record type definition>
> Nevertheless, my suggestion still stands. For all the helper record
> methods and forms, something that more directly reads as being record
> related would be better than "rtd".

Oh -- I forgot to mention: rtd is shorthand for record type descriptor,
not record type definition.  So your email should be taken as further
evidence that the notational assumptions are not well described.

Also, I now realize rtd is used in SRFI 99 names, not to coincide with
R6RS, but to avoid name clashes.  Perhaps this should be stated early in
the specification?

David