On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 5:16 PM Ciprian Dorin Craciun <xxxxxx@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 1:07 AM Alex Shinn <xxxxxx@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Besides Arthur's point, the other issue with Scribble is that it is
>> very Scheme centric and "exotic".  Many smaller Scheme implementations
>> wouldn't be able to come up with a Scribble implementation right away.
>
> I would argue that Scheme - centric is a good thing for SRFIs, and there's a portable R7RS implementation in Chibi.

I think that our perspectives differ a lot on this one mainly based on
how we view Scheme:
* you as the developer of Chibi --  a major R7RS implementation (and
with a lot of extras) -- see Scheme as a "major" programming language;
* me on the other side see Scheme as a DSL language that could be used
instead of Lua in may places;

Therefore if one would to implement a scheme interpreter (like I was),
and if one would like to integrate the SRFI (and especially R7RS)
documentation in his own implementation, one would have a hard time,
especially since in order to extract the documentation one would have
to use an external implementation.

I don't want to derail the conversation here or discourage efforts at better markup.
But just to be clear, whether or not you consider Scheme "major," we are talking
about documents entirely devoted to Scheme to begin with.

And, no, you wouldn't have to use an external implementation since
(chibi scribble) is portable and even packaged on snow-fort.org.

So I'll update my tools to generate the new markup and probably share them.
I just find html extremely unpleasant to write by hand.

--
Alex