On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 10:31 AM Lassi Kortela <xxxxxx@lassi.io> wrote:
 
This would be nice to have. We can probably auto-extract it from <a
href="..."> tags or by searching the plain text of the document for
the regexp "SRFI\s+(\d+)".

It's a bit more curated than that.  There would probably be far too many connections if we did that search.
 
Also, your srfi-data.scm categorizes each SRFI. That sounds useful.

Yes, thanks, I forgot about that.  My categorization isn't great, and I would be grateful for help with that.
 
Just remembered: if the metadata files are in the same repo as each
SRFI's HTML, then it's easier to inspect changes to the metadata
whenever the HTML is updated (simply by using `git diff`). If the new
metadata looks OK then it can be committed, and people can use the git
log to see metadata changes in addition to HTML changes. I have a
feeling this might be a big help if/when debugging metadata problems.

Yes, that's a good point.  Proximity is helpful for catching errors.