On Fri, Apr 19, 2019 at 11:21 AM John Cowan <xxxxxx@ccil.org> wrote:
 
True, O King, live forever!

Wow, that's a new one to me!  I like it, whatever it means.
 
But that doesn't help the users, many of whom will use what the implementers package.  Perhaps strong advice to package the new SRFI using the module/library name of the old one will do the trick.  I also think a post-finalization note is called for, stronger than just external links. 

Both of those sound eminently reasonable.  I should have suggested a post-finalization note myself.