Unfortunately not.  While Google weeds out most of the outright spam, there are several irritating blasts a day from some asshole who thinks Schemers are interested in his notion, very strongly expressed (at first in Italian and later in English) that various Italian politicians are corrupt child molesters.

Just ask Arthur for another list, schemelibs or whatever.  We can have as many as we want, and as long as *total* traffic doesn't get out of hand (and why should it?) I can certainly follow them all.

On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 5:49 AM Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen <xxxxxx@nieper-wisskirchen.de> wrote:
Am Do., 24. Okt. 2019 um 10:00 Uhr schrieb Lassi Kortela <xxxxxx@lassi.io>:
> How does everyone feel about the pace of discussion right now? I could
> send some more SRFIs before the end of the year but if people are
> overloaded or weary with the current pace, I can postpone them.

I would vote for a slower pace.

> The most important topic would be library lookup and packaging which I
> think is the biggest impediment to portable and convenient Scheme usage
> right now. A `#! /usr/bin/env scheme-script` that supports all Scheme
> implementations as well as the library/packaging standard would also be
> pertinent. As with keywords, a long and involved discussion is needed.

When long and involved discussions are needed, it may be a good idea
to have them before an actual first draft of a SRFI is being
published. Maybe comp.lang.scheme is a good place for these