Let me quote the definition of AND from SPDX 2.2.2:

If required to simultaneously comply with two or more licenses, use the conjunctive binary "AND" operator to construct a new license expression, where both the left and right operands are a valid license expression values.

For example, when one is required to comply with both the LGPL-2.1-only or MIT licenses, a valid expression would be:

LGPL-2.1-only AND MIT

However, in the general case the terms under which a derivative work is licensed do not include the license terms of the original work.  For example, if Alice writes a book and licenses Bob to make a movie from it, the licensing terms of the movie are chosen by Bob, and have nothing to do with the terms of Alice's license with Bob (unless Alice so requires).  AND, therefore, is inapplicable.  If Alice uses a strong copyleft license like the GNU GPL, then she is imposing such a requirement, but if she chooses a weak copyleft or "copycenter" license, there is no such requirement.