Archive file SRFIs
Lassi Kortela
(01 Apr 2019 08:49 UTC)
|
Re: Archive file SRFIs
Arthur A. Gleckler
(01 Apr 2019 15:05 UTC)
|
Re: Archive file SRFIs
Lassi Kortela
(01 Apr 2019 16:29 UTC)
|
Re: Archive file SRFIs
John Cowan
(01 Apr 2019 16:47 UTC)
|
Re: Archive file SRFIs
Lassi Kortela
(01 Apr 2019 17:38 UTC)
|
Re: Archive file SRFIs
Göran Weinholt
(01 Apr 2019 20:14 UTC)
|
Re: Archive file SRFIs
Lassi Kortela
(05 Apr 2019 21:47 UTC)
|
Re: Archive file SRFIs Lassi Kortela (05 Apr 2019 22:17 UTC)
|
Re: Archive file SRFIs
Lassi Kortela
(07 Apr 2019 16:53 UTC)
|
Re: Archive file SRFIs
John Cowan
(07 Apr 2019 17:54 UTC)
|
Re: Archive file SRFIs Lassi Kortela 05 Apr 2019 22:17 UTC
By the way if anyone here is an FFI wizard, please email me... I have a proposal for a unified way to structure the APIs of shared libraries so they can be auto-loaded into any dynamic language implementation. So if you have the shared library file, it will self-describe itself to the high-level language in a standard format so the HLL programmer doesn't have to write any bindings specific to that library. I thought of a way to do this without inordinate changes to the way existing useful C libraries are written, using things like OpenGL and libarchive as test cases. I'm largely out of my depth on that stuff so there may be some dumb oversight but I can't think of any way it wouldn't work. I thought to just email Kent Dybvig to ask whether the idea is stupid once I have actually wrapped a couple of libraries.