Lassi Kortela <xxxxxx@lassi.io> writes:

>> Suggestions for a format to accommodate both the (scheme foo) names
>> and the existing names?
>
> Some sketching:
>
> SRFI 1 has a de facto R6RS library-name (srfi 1 lists) and is also in
> R7RS-large Red Edition:
>
> (srfi 1)             ; the usual name
> (srfi 1 lists)       ; de facto R6RS library-name
> (scheme list)        ; R7RS-large, red edition

Don't forget about SRFI-97 which has R6RS library names for many SRFIs:

  https://srfi.schemers.org/srfi-97/srfi-97.html

E.g. (srfi :1 lists).

SRFIs that came afterwards may or may not have consistent naming of
their implementations.

Regards,

--
Göran Weinholt   | https://weinholt.se/
Debian Developer | 73 de SA6CJK