SRFI development in the age of git John Cowan (12 Jul 2020 23:15 UTC)
Re: SRFI development in the age of git Bradley Lucier (12 Jul 2020 23:54 UTC)
Re: SRFI development in the age of git Arthur A. Gleckler (13 Jul 2020 00:31 UTC)
Re: SRFI development in the age of git Arthur A. Gleckler (13 Jul 2020 00:30 UTC)
Re: SRFI development in the age of git Arthur A. Gleckler (13 Jul 2020 01:35 UTC)
Re: SRFI development in the age of git Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (13 Jul 2020 06:45 UTC)
Re: SRFI development in the age of git Linas Vepstas (13 Jul 2020 07:05 UTC)
Re: SRFI development in the age of git Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (13 Jul 2020 07:09 UTC)
Re: SRFI development in the age of git Linas Vepstas (13 Jul 2020 07:34 UTC)
Re: SRFI development in the age of git John Cowan (13 Jul 2020 18:10 UTC)
Re: SRFI development in the age of git Linas Vepstas (13 Jul 2020 21:40 UTC)
Re: SRFI development in the age of git John Cowan (14 Jul 2020 00:38 UTC)
Re: SRFI development in the age of git Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (14 Jul 2020 09:59 UTC)
Re: SRFI development in the age of git Linas Vepstas (14 Jul 2020 22:54 UTC)
Re: SRFI development in the age of git John Cowan (14 Jul 2020 23:12 UTC)
Re: SRFI development in the age of git Linas Vepstas (14 Jul 2020 23:57 UTC)
Re: SRFI development in the age of git John Cowan (15 Jul 2020 03:51 UTC)
Re: SRFI development in the age of git Linas Vepstas (15 Jul 2020 08:34 UTC)
Re: SRFI development in the age of git Arthur A. Gleckler (13 Jul 2020 07:40 UTC)
Re: SRFI development in the age of git Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (13 Jul 2020 07:46 UTC)
Re: SRFI development in the age of git Arthur A. Gleckler (13 Jul 2020 15:59 UTC)

Re: SRFI development in the age of git Bradley Lucier 12 Jul 2020 23:54 UTC

On 7/12/20 7:15 PM, John Cowan wrote:
> But as we have seen in SRFI 194, last calls often lead to last minute
> proposals

Actually, I was surprised to see something that looked like a "last
call" when I hadn't seen something that looked like a complete and
stable document and implementation.

Brad