Establishing a Scheme registry
Lassi Kortela
(31 Jul 2020 08:14 UTC)
|
Re: Establishing a Scheme registry Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (31 Jul 2020 08:39 UTC)
|
Re: Establishing a Scheme registry
Lassi Kortela
(31 Jul 2020 08:49 UTC)
|
Prior art: SRFI 97
Lassi Kortela
(31 Jul 2020 08:59 UTC)
|
Re: Prior art: SRFI 97
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(31 Jul 2020 09:18 UTC)
|
Re: Prior art: SRFI 97
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(31 Jul 2020 09:20 UTC)
|
Re: Prior art: SRFI 97
Lassi Kortela
(31 Jul 2020 09:39 UTC)
|
Re: Prior art: SRFI 97
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(31 Jul 2020 09:58 UTC)
|
Re: Prior art: SRFI 97
Lassi Kortela
(31 Jul 2020 10:13 UTC)
|
Re: Prior art: SRFI 97
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(31 Jul 2020 10:18 UTC)
|
Python PEPs
Lassi Kortela
(31 Jul 2020 10:23 UTC)
|
Re: Python PEPs
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(31 Jul 2020 11:12 UTC)
|
Re: Python PEPs
Lassi Kortela
(04 Aug 2020 07:04 UTC)
|
Re: Python PEPs
hga@xxxxxx
(04 Aug 2020 09:28 UTC)
|
Re: Prior art: SRFI 97
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(31 Jul 2020 13:31 UTC)
|
Re: Establishing a Scheme registry
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(31 Jul 2020 09:13 UTC)
|
Re: Establishing a Scheme registry
John Cowan
(01 Aug 2020 03:49 UTC)
|
Re: Establishing a Scheme registry
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(01 Aug 2020 06:29 UTC)
|
Re: Establishing a Scheme registry
John Cowan
(01 Aug 2020 13:19 UTC)
|
Re: Establishing a Scheme registry
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(01 Aug 2020 13:48 UTC)
|
Re: Establishing a Scheme registry
Amirouche Boubekki
(01 Aug 2020 13:55 UTC)
|
Re: Establishing a Scheme registry
Arthur A. Gleckler
(31 Jul 2020 20:09 UTC)
|
Re: Establishing a Scheme registry
hga@xxxxxx
(31 Jul 2020 20:34 UTC)
|
Re: Establishing a Scheme registry
John Cowan
(01 Aug 2020 01:58 UTC)
|
Re: Establishing a Scheme registry
Amirouche Boubekki
(31 Jul 2020 09:04 UTC)
|
Re: Establishing a Scheme registry
hga@xxxxxx
(31 Jul 2020 20:52 UTC)
|
Re: Establishing a Scheme registry
Lassi Kortela
(01 Aug 2020 19:50 UTC)
|
We may need further registries, for example for standardized feature identifiers that extend the small list in R7RS-small. I would have proposed to use the SRFI process for it. Whenever there is a major change in the registry, an updated SRFI (only containing that registry) is issued while the previous version will be withdrawn. I think it is simpler or safer than inventing a new process, whose life may depend on the lifetime of the git repo chosen. Marc Am Fr., 31. Juli 2020 um 10:14 Uhr schrieb Lassi Kortela <xxxxxx@lassi.io>: > > Earlier this week we discussed on the SRFI 198 mailing list that there > should be a community-wide registry for foreign error types. The set of > known error types is necessarily evolving so it can't be in the SRFI. It > will surely be useful to define other evolving sets of things in future > SRFIs. > > To that end, we should establish some kind of lightweight registry for > identifiers and other such things. Harold suggested, and Arthur and I > agreed, that it could be a Git repo + low-traffic mailing list. > Submissions could be via pull request / mailing list, quite informal. > > Harold and I thought xxxxxx@srfi.schemers.org would be a fitting > name for the mailing list. The SRFI domain is currently by far the > easiest place for us to set up new Scheme mailing lists, and Arthur is > good at administering them. > > The Git repo could be under > > - https://github.com/scheme-requests-for-implementation > - https://github.com/srfi-explorations > - some other organization > > We can make subdomains under scheme.org, so we could also set up a > simple static page at https://registry.scheme.org/