Establishing a Scheme registry
Lassi Kortela
(31 Jul 2020 08:14 UTC)
|
Re: Establishing a Scheme registry
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(31 Jul 2020 08:39 UTC)
|
Re: Establishing a Scheme registry
Lassi Kortela
(31 Jul 2020 08:49 UTC)
|
Prior art: SRFI 97
Lassi Kortela
(31 Jul 2020 08:59 UTC)
|
Re: Prior art: SRFI 97 Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (31 Jul 2020 09:18 UTC)
|
Re: Prior art: SRFI 97
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(31 Jul 2020 09:20 UTC)
|
Re: Prior art: SRFI 97
Lassi Kortela
(31 Jul 2020 09:39 UTC)
|
Re: Prior art: SRFI 97
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(31 Jul 2020 09:58 UTC)
|
Re: Prior art: SRFI 97
Lassi Kortela
(31 Jul 2020 10:13 UTC)
|
Re: Prior art: SRFI 97
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(31 Jul 2020 10:18 UTC)
|
Python PEPs
Lassi Kortela
(31 Jul 2020 10:23 UTC)
|
Re: Python PEPs
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(31 Jul 2020 11:12 UTC)
|
Re: Python PEPs
Lassi Kortela
(04 Aug 2020 07:04 UTC)
|
Re: Python PEPs
hga@xxxxxx
(04 Aug 2020 09:28 UTC)
|
Re: Prior art: SRFI 97
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(31 Jul 2020 13:31 UTC)
|
Re: Establishing a Scheme registry
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(31 Jul 2020 09:13 UTC)
|
Re: Establishing a Scheme registry
John Cowan
(01 Aug 2020 03:49 UTC)
|
Re: Establishing a Scheme registry
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(01 Aug 2020 06:29 UTC)
|
Re: Establishing a Scheme registry
John Cowan
(01 Aug 2020 13:19 UTC)
|
Re: Establishing a Scheme registry
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(01 Aug 2020 13:48 UTC)
|
Re: Establishing a Scheme registry
Amirouche Boubekki
(01 Aug 2020 13:55 UTC)
|
Re: Establishing a Scheme registry
Arthur A. Gleckler
(31 Jul 2020 20:09 UTC)
|
Re: Establishing a Scheme registry
hga@xxxxxx
(31 Jul 2020 20:34 UTC)
|
Re: Establishing a Scheme registry
John Cowan
(01 Aug 2020 01:58 UTC)
|
Re: Establishing a Scheme registry
Amirouche Boubekki
(31 Jul 2020 09:04 UTC)
|
Re: Establishing a Scheme registry
hga@xxxxxx
(31 Jul 2020 20:52 UTC)
|
Re: Establishing a Scheme registry
Lassi Kortela
(01 Aug 2020 19:50 UTC)
|
Am Fr., 31. Juli 2020 um 10:59 Uhr schrieb Lassi Kortela <xxxxxx@lassi.io>: > > There's a registry in SRFI 97: SRFI Libraries. > <https://srfi.schemers.org/srfi-97/srfi-97.html> > > As that SRFI shows, things get a bit messy. The document lays out > guidelines for what to do in the future about new entries, and added a > post-finalization note last year about the fact that the names are now > tracked in an S-expression file in `srfi-common`. > > IMHO this document illustrates the fact that the SRFI process is not > geared toward publishing evolving lists, though I agree that finalized > documents are great for archival. Please note that this is not the process I have proposed. Instead of adding to some not formally archived data file, a new version of SRFI 97 would have been published (say with each iteration of R7RS-large), obsoleting the respectively previous one.