Establishing a Scheme registry
Lassi Kortela
(31 Jul 2020 08:14 UTC)
|
Re: Establishing a Scheme registry
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(31 Jul 2020 08:39 UTC)
|
Re: Establishing a Scheme registry
Lassi Kortela
(31 Jul 2020 08:49 UTC)
|
Prior art: SRFI 97
Lassi Kortela
(31 Jul 2020 08:59 UTC)
|
Re: Prior art: SRFI 97
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(31 Jul 2020 09:18 UTC)
|
Re: Prior art: SRFI 97
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(31 Jul 2020 09:20 UTC)
|
Re: Prior art: SRFI 97
Lassi Kortela
(31 Jul 2020 09:39 UTC)
|
Re: Prior art: SRFI 97
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(31 Jul 2020 09:58 UTC)
|
Re: Prior art: SRFI 97
Lassi Kortela
(31 Jul 2020 10:13 UTC)
|
Re: Prior art: SRFI 97
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(31 Jul 2020 10:18 UTC)
|
Python PEPs
Lassi Kortela
(31 Jul 2020 10:23 UTC)
|
Re: Python PEPs
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(31 Jul 2020 11:12 UTC)
|
Re: Python PEPs
Lassi Kortela
(04 Aug 2020 07:04 UTC)
|
Re: Python PEPs
hga@xxxxxx
(04 Aug 2020 09:28 UTC)
|
Re: Prior art: SRFI 97
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(31 Jul 2020 13:31 UTC)
|
Re: Establishing a Scheme registry
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(31 Jul 2020 09:13 UTC)
|
Re: Establishing a Scheme registry
John Cowan
(01 Aug 2020 03:49 UTC)
|
Re: Establishing a Scheme registry
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(01 Aug 2020 06:29 UTC)
|
Re: Establishing a Scheme registry
John Cowan
(01 Aug 2020 13:19 UTC)
|
Re: Establishing a Scheme registry
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(01 Aug 2020 13:48 UTC)
|
Re: Establishing a Scheme registry
Amirouche Boubekki
(01 Aug 2020 13:55 UTC)
|
Re: Establishing a Scheme registry
Arthur A. Gleckler
(31 Jul 2020 20:09 UTC)
|
Re: Establishing a Scheme registry
hga@xxxxxx
(31 Jul 2020 20:34 UTC)
|
Re: Establishing a Scheme registry
John Cowan
(01 Aug 2020 01:58 UTC)
|
Re: Establishing a Scheme registry
Amirouche Boubekki
(31 Jul 2020 09:04 UTC)
|
Re: Establishing a Scheme registry hga@xxxxxx (31 Jul 2020 20:52 UTC)
|
Re: Establishing a Scheme registry
Lassi Kortela
(01 Aug 2020 19:50 UTC)
|
> From: Lassi Kortela <xxxxxx@lassi.io> > Date: Friday, July 31, 2020 3:14 AM > > Earlier this week we discussed on the SRFI 198 mailing list that there > should be a community-wide registry for foreign error types. The set of > known error types is necessarily evolving so it can't be in the SRFI. It > will surely be useful to define other evolving sets of things in future > SRFIs. > > To that end, we should establish some kind of lightweight registry for > identifiers and other such things. Harold suggested, and Arthur and I > agreed, that it could be a Git repo + low-traffic mailing list. > Submissions could be via pull request / mailing list, quite informal. We'll probably end up with a "low-traffic mailing list", but a real forum would likely be better for this sort of thing, but way too much effort for us, at least today. But how about the following: Submissions as pull requests to the current master repo would work well, you just need discipline about putting discussions in the mailing list ... or scrape the repo provider's pull comments when the decisions is made about the pull request, and post that as a digest to the mailing list. That would help keep the traffic lower, not bothering people about registries they have no interest in, except for the initial announcement, the final digest, and whatever the participants decide should go to the mailing list anyway. For "quite informal", from experience elsewhere I recommend selecting a small pool of gatekeepers, and OKing additions and changes that any two of them agree upon. > [ Mailing list specifics. ] > > The Git repo could be under.... > > We can make subdomains under scheme.org, so we could also set up a > simple static page at https://registry.scheme.org/ My idea was first that a page we control would direct people to the canonical copy/copies of the registry data. In this case, one or more git repoes hosted by different organizations, or just switch as needed if it comes to that. That way SRFIs can refer to that page, and with the expansion in ambition, a particular git managed file or subdirectory listed on it. - Harold