Am Mi., 23. Sept. 2020 um 14:52 Uhr schrieb Jim Rees <xxxxxx@gmail.com>: > > On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 2:02 AM Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen <xxxxxx@nieper-wisskirchen.de> wrote: >> >> >> What do you exactly mean by "does not contaminate the local >> environment"? That the hypothetical library body of, in this example, >> (scheme list) does not see the bindings of (srfi 1)? > > > Exactly. I wanted to isolate the effects of export-from and import from each other. I would suggest merging this with `define-library-alias', which would then become `define-library-composition'. What do you think? In any case, this discussion shows that one shouldn't add extensions to the module language lightly as the semantics can be surprising when low-level macros and unhygiene is involved.
