> I suppose, but is it truly useful?  I'm trying to keep the site simple.

I find such a page clearer than listing the library names decoupled from
the (import ...) context in which they are used, and find the precise
import syntax hard to remember without complete examples. It would also
help pick new library names in the future if all the existing ones are
clearly shown in one place.

However, if you'd like to keep srfi.schemers.org simple, we could
instead put the listing somewhere under scheme.org. We could list the
(scheme <foo>) imports on the same page as well.

We could track the names under registry.scheme.org, which would get us a
HTML table of them for free, but it's probably better to track stuff
directly related to SRFIs in srfi-data.scm.