Re: Is recieve macro from base implementation of SRFI-1 in fact SRFI-8? Jakub T. Jankiewicz 24 Aug 2021 08:38 UTC
On Tue, 24 Aug 2021 09:50:53 +0200 Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen <xxxxxx@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks for sharing this. As for the name: After having rethought it, the > name "opt-lambda" (or a similar one) is the better name because we already > have case-lambda (and match-lambda in SRFI 204). > > (opt-lambda (x y (z a) . rest) > ...) > > and not > > (opt-lambda (x y (z a) rest) > ...) > case and match are full words so I would use: optional-lambda instead of opt-lambda Just want to be sure that this will not land in SRFI. I don't know all SRFI but it seems that most functions don't use shortcuts in names. -- Jakub T. Jankiewicz, Web Developer https://jcubic.pl/me