Announcement Loop Facility
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(16 Aug 2022 08:31 UTC)
|
Re: Announcement Loop Facility
Lassi Kortela
(16 Aug 2022 09:03 UTC)
|
Re: Announcement Loop Facility
Vladimir Nikishkin
(16 Aug 2022 09:24 UTC)
|
Re: Announcement Loop Facility
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(16 Aug 2022 09:43 UTC)
|
Re: Announcement Loop Facility
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(16 Aug 2022 10:01 UTC)
|
Re: Announcement Loop Facility
Ricardo G. Herdt
(16 Aug 2022 10:04 UTC)
|
Re: Announcement Loop Facility
Lassi Kortela
(16 Aug 2022 10:17 UTC)
|
Re: Announcement Loop Facility Ricardo G. Herdt (16 Aug 2022 10:22 UTC)
|
Re: Announcement Loop Facility
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(16 Aug 2022 10:39 UTC)
|
Name of the loop macro
Lassi Kortela
(16 Aug 2022 10:55 UTC)
|
Re: Name of the loop macro
John Cowan
(16 Aug 2022 11:03 UTC)
|
Re: Name of the loop macro
Jakub T. Jankiewicz
(16 Aug 2022 11:18 UTC)
|
Re: Name of the loop macro
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(16 Aug 2022 11:25 UTC)
|
Changing the binding of quote et.al.
Lassi Kortela
(16 Aug 2022 11:46 UTC)
|
Re: Name of the loop macro
John Cowan
(16 Aug 2022 11:57 UTC)
|
Re: Name of the loop macro
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(16 Aug 2022 12:33 UTC)
|
Re: Name of the loop macro
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(16 Aug 2022 11:16 UTC)
|
Indeed, so no need to worry about broken code. But for clarity I probably should use something else anyway. Am 16.08.2022 12:17 schrieb Lassi Kortela: >> Out of curiosity, do you plan to call it 'loop'? That will probably >> break all my code, I should start renaming my named lets to 'lp' :) > > At least in R7RS, the following seems to work as intended: > > (import (scheme base) (scheme write)) > > (define-syntax loop > (syntax-rules () > ((loop . ignored) > (syntax-error "No loop for you!")))) > > (define (my-iota n) > (let loop ((n n) (list '())) > (let ((n (- n 1))) > (if (negative? n) list (loop n (cons n list)))))) > > (write (my-iota 10)) > (newline)