On 10 Dec 2022, at 19:55, Arthur A. Gleckler <xxxxxx@speechcode.com> wrote:

> Would it be reasonable to add the clarification I described?  I want to make absolutely sure that there's no question about retroactively redefining old APIs.  People were very unhappy with that, and rightly so.

I see the potential for ambiguity raised by the inclusion of ‘Scheme implementations’ in the list of things which will hopefully add support. I would simply add another sentence between the two currently in that paragraoph: ‘The identifiers in this library are not retroactively added to the exports of any other SRFI library.’

Daphne