It seems you send this as reply to recent thread. I suggest posting it as
standalone post. Most people probably get bored by this discussion and don't
read it.

On Tue, 4 Jun 2024 16:30:36 -0400
Sergei Egorov - esl at acm.org (via srfi-discuss list)
<xxxxxx@srfi.schemers.org> wrote:

> Dear Schemers,
>
> Would you be interested in seeing the following SRFI to be submitted, or is
> it something that is already beaten to death?
>
> Best regards,
> --Sergei
>
>
> SRFI XXX:  Bodies in COND, CASE, WHEN, UNLESS, and DO
>
> Abstract
>
> While most traditional Scheme constructs with implicit sequencing allow
> internal definitions, some of them do not. It is quite easy to extend the
> functionality of the remaining constructs to allow internal definitions.
> Such an extension will be fully backward-compatible while offering more
> convenience to those who write and read Scheme code.
>
> Full text:
>
> https://malgil.com/esl/srfi/srfi-bodies.html
>
>

--
Jakub T. Jankiewicz, Senior Front-End Developer
https://jcubic.pl/me
https://lips.js.org
https://koduj.org