Sample implementation licences Daphne Preston-Kendal (31 Aug 2024 09:18 UTC)
Re: Sample implementation licences Arthur A. Gleckler (31 Aug 2024 16:12 UTC)
Re: Sample implementation licences Daphne Preston-Kendal (31 Aug 2024 19:12 UTC)
Re: Sample implementation licences Arthur A. Gleckler (31 Aug 2024 19:19 UTC)
Re: Sample implementation licences Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (31 Aug 2024 20:02 UTC)
Re: Sample implementation licences Daphne Preston-Kendal (31 Aug 2024 20:49 UTC)
Re: Sample implementation licences Daphne Preston-Kendal (31 Aug 2024 20:51 UTC)
Re: Sample implementation licences Arthur A. Gleckler (31 Aug 2024 20:55 UTC)
Re: Sample implementation licences Daphne Preston-Kendal (31 Aug 2024 20:57 UTC)
Re: Sample implementation licences Arthur A. Gleckler (31 Aug 2024 21:01 UTC)
Re: Sample implementation licences Daphne Preston-Kendal (31 Aug 2024 21:33 UTC)
Re: Sample implementation licences Lassi Kortela (01 Sep 2024 08:19 UTC)
Re: Sample implementation licences Philip McGrath (02 Sep 2024 00:00 UTC)

Re: Sample implementation licences Daphne Preston-Kendal 31 Aug 2024 20:50 UTC

On 31 Aug 2024, at 21:18, Arthur A. Gleckler <xxxxxx@speechcode.com> wrote:

> Yes, I understand your concern.  However, searching for "dual license mit cc0," I find many cases claiming that the two are, in fact, compatible in many jurisdictions.

Fine. I think this is nonsense; but if, as SRFI Editor, you attach a copyright declaration in my name to a work I have dedicated to the public domain and in which no copyright exists, that’s on you.

Daphne