Re: Anonymous records Antero Mejr (30 Sep 2024 02:45 UTC)
Re: Anonymous records Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (30 Sep 2024 06:02 UTC)
Re: Anonymous records Daphne Preston-Kendal (30 Sep 2024 07:08 UTC)
Re: Anonymous records Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (30 Sep 2024 07:30 UTC)
Re: Anonymous records Daphne Preston-Kendal (30 Sep 2024 07:46 UTC)
Re: Anonymous records Antero Mejr (30 Sep 2024 19:26 UTC)
Re: Anonymous records Daphne Preston-Kendal (30 Sep 2024 20:12 UTC)
Re: Anonymous records Sergei Egorov (30 Sep 2024 21:07 UTC)
Re: R7RS large primitives [was: Re: Anonymous records] Antero Mejr (02 Oct 2024 22:28 UTC)
Re: R7RS large primitives [was: Re: Anonymous records] Sergei Egorov (02 Oct 2024 23:17 UTC)
Re: Anonymous records Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe (01 Oct 2024 00:58 UTC)
Re: Anonymous records Antero Mejr (01 Oct 2024 03:24 UTC)
Re: Anonymous records Arthur A. Gleckler (01 Oct 2024 03:46 UTC)
Scheme meetups [was: Re: Anonymous records] Peter Bex (01 Oct 2024 19:20 UTC)
Re: Anonymous records Retropikzel (07 Oct 2024 16:14 UTC)
Re: Anonymous records Peter Bex (07 Oct 2024 18:01 UTC)
Re: Anonymous records Arthur A. Gleckler (07 Oct 2024 19:57 UTC)

Re: R7RS large primitives [was: Re: Anonymous records] Sergei Egorov 02 Oct 2024 23:16 UTC

Thanks, Antero, I had no idea -- will look it up. There are no pointers to
any of it
on scheme.org, so it is hard to find without knowing what you are looking
for.

Best,
-S

On Wednesday, October 2, 2024 6:28:37 PM (-04:00), Antero Mejr wrote:

 > Sergei Egorov <xxxxxx@acm.org> writes:
 >
 > > Would it be reasonable to suggest, as a part of R7RS Large process, to
 > > explicitly specify a superset of R7RS Small (we may informally call it
R7RS
 > > Medium) having just enough extra primitives and mechanisms to allow
for
 > > practical R7RS Large reference implementation to be distributed as a
portable
 > > set of R7RS Medium-based libraries, with minimal cond-expand tricks?
 > >
 > > This would allow small Scheme implementors to partake in R7RS Large
game with
 > > reasonable additional effort.
 >
 > I think this is the purpose of having the "Foundations" sections of
 > R7RS-large, as opposed to the "Batteries" sections, which can be built
 > on top.