I want to support this!

To make such a keyword most helpful, I would restrict it to SRFIs
proposing a way to create structured types in Scheme and would not tag
SRFIs that only tangentially refer to records.

Am Do., 6. Feb. 2025 um 16:09 Uhr schrieb Daphne Preston-Kendal
<xxxxxx@nonceword.org>:
>
> Dear Arthur, dear all,
>
> Could I request that the search feature on the main srfi.schemers.org page should be extended with an additional keyword for SRFIs, ‘record types’? At the moment, record type SRFIs are all classified under ‘data structures’ and are linked inconsistently with one another through the ‘see also’ field, but it’s hard to find all record type proposals ever made. ‘Data structures’ also includes, well, data structures such as SRFI 214 flexvectors, SRFI 146 mappings, etc.
>
> The keyword should apply to these SRFIs (I may have missed some): 9, 20, 57, 76, 99, 100, 131, 136, 137, 150, 184, 237, 240, maybe 253 (because of define-record-type-checked), 256. Maybe also 219 and 249.
>
>
> Daphne
>