Michael Sperber [Mr.  Preprocessor] <xxxxxx@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de> wrote:
> We're going around in circles: Al is suggesting attaching variant
> numbers to the names. [...]

Which is likely to be 1 in nearly every case.

> What good are portable-across-implementation names if the module
> system you're using them in isn't portable? [...]

That's a separate problem which will hopefully be addressed by different
means.  At least, the naming could be used by srfi-0 for a file inside of
some sort of loading scaffold.