Re: SRFI 264 should not be tagged ‘Pattern Matching’ Daphne Preston-Kendal (15 Sep 2025 21:54 UTC)
Re: SRFI 264 should not be tagged ‘Pattern Matching’ Arthur A. Gleckler (15 Sep 2025 23:57 UTC)

Re: SRFI 264 should not be tagged ‘Pattern Matching’ Daphne Preston-Kendal 15 Sep 2025 21:54 UTC

On 15 Sep 2025, at 23:42, Arthur A. Gleckler <xxxxxx@speechcode.com> wrote:

> Thanks.  I've made the change.  However, "data structure" doesn't feel right, either.  I'd be glad for another recommendation, especially if it applies to several SRFIs.  I could just use "miscellaneous."

I think ‘Text’ or ‘Strings’ or ‘String Processing’ or something like that could be a viable new tag, with SRFIs: 13, 14, 75, 109, 115, 118, 129, 130, 135, 140, 152, 185, 264. Also potentially 28, 48, 159, 166.

Daphne