Re: SRFI 264 should not be tagged ‘Pattern Matching’
Daphne Preston-Kendal 15 Sep 2025 21:54 UTC
On 15 Sep 2025, at 23:42, Arthur A. Gleckler <xxxxxx@speechcode.com> wrote:
> Thanks. I've made the change. However, "data structure" doesn't feel right, either. I'd be glad for another recommendation, especially if it applies to several SRFIs. I could just use "miscellaneous."
I think ‘Text’ or ‘Strings’ or ‘String Processing’ or something like that could be a viable new tag, with SRFIs: 13, 14, 75, 109, 115, 118, 129, 130, 135, 140, 152, 185, 264. Also potentially 28, 48, 159, 166.
Daphne