Thread Index - November 2015 - srfi-126@srfi.schemers.org

sixty days Arthur A. Gleckler (07 Nov 2015 17:15 UTC)
hash functions should not be required to accept two arguments William D Clinger (09 Nov 2015 17:42 UTC)
Re: hash functions should not be required to accept two arguments William D Clinger (10 Nov 2015 12:02 UTC)
Re: hash functions should not be required to accept two arguments taylanbayirli@xxxxxx (10 Nov 2015 13:00 UTC)
Re: hash functions should not be required to accept two arguments William D Clinger (10 Nov 2015 13:50 UTC)
Re: hash functions should not be required to accept two arguments taylanbayirli@xxxxxx (10 Nov 2015 14:27 UTC)
Hash salt John Cowan (10 Nov 2015 06:37 UTC)
Re: Hash salt taylanbayirli@xxxxxx (10 Nov 2015 10:00 UTC)
Re: Hash salt John Cowan (11 Nov 2015 05:21 UTC)
Re: Hash salt Shiro Kawai (11 Nov 2015 05:59 UTC)
Re: Hash salt John Cowan (11 Nov 2015 06:22 UTC)
Re: Hash salt taylanbayirli@xxxxxx (11 Nov 2015 07:54 UTC)
Re: hash functions should not be required to accept two arguments taylanbayirli@xxxxxx (10 Nov 2015 09:58 UTC)
My recommendation for the bounds argument John Cowan (10 Nov 2015 07:27 UTC)
Re: My recommendation for the bounds argument taylanbayirli@xxxxxx (10 Nov 2015 10:03 UTC)
Re: My recommendation for the bounds argument John Cowan (10 Nov 2015 15:40 UTC)
Fwd: [srfi-126] draft #9 (#8) Arthur A. Gleckler (12 Nov 2015 18:52 UTC)
hash function bounds summarized Alex Shinn (25 Nov 2015 23:16 UTC)
Re: hash function bounds summarized taylanbayirli@xxxxxx (26 Nov 2015 09:30 UTC)
Re: hash function bounds summarized John Cowan (27 Nov 2015 08:01 UTC)
Re: hash function bounds summarized Alex Shinn (30 Nov 2015 23:38 UTC)
Re: hash function bounds summarized John Cowan (30 Nov 2015 04:26 UTC)
Re: hash function bounds summarized Shiro Kawai (30 Nov 2015 04:52 UTC)
Re: hash function bounds summarized Alex Shinn (30 Nov 2015 23:45 UTC)
Re: hash function bounds summarized Alex Shinn (30 Nov 2015 23:23 UTC)