Re: SRFI 127: ninety days
Arthur A. Gleckler 19 Jan 2016 00:04 UTC
John Cowan <xxxxxx@mercury.ccil.org> writes:
| I am requesting finalization for SRFI 127 as-is.
On 19 Dec, you said "SRFI 127 (lazy sequences) has bugs in
the implementation." There haven't been any updates since
then. However, the Issues section says, "None at present."
Can you characterize the bugs?
