SRFI 127: ninety days Arthur A. Gleckler (18 Jan 2016 21:18 UTC)
Re: SRFI 127: ninety days John Cowan (18 Jan 2016 23:53 UTC)
Re: SRFI 127: ninety days Arthur A. Gleckler (19 Jan 2016 00:04 UTC)
Re: SRFI 127: ninety days John Cowan (19 Jan 2016 02:04 UTC)
Re: SRFI 127: ninety days Arthur A. Gleckler (19 Jan 2016 02:44 UTC)

Re: SRFI 127: ninety days John Cowan 19 Jan 2016 02:04 UTC

Arthur A. Gleckler scripsit:

> On 19 Dec, you said "SRFI 127 (lazy sequences) has bugs in
> the implementation."  There haven't been any updates since
> then.  However, the Issues section says, "None at present."

SRFI 127 is passing all its tests, and I can't find any emails either
direct to me or on the mailing list archive that refer to such bugs.
So I can only conclude that I was confusing it with some other SRFI.

--
John Cowan          http://www.ccil.org/~cowan        xxxxxx@ccil.org
"After all, would you consider a man without honor wealthy, even if his
Dinar laid end to end would reach from here to the Temple of Toplat?"
"No, I wouldn't", the beggar replied.  "Why is that?" the Master asked.
"A Dinar doesn't go very far these days, Master.        --Kehlog Albran
Besides, the Temple of Toplat is across the street."      The Profit