Date Index - January 2004 - srfi-50@srfi.schemers.org

01 Jan 2004 15:04 UTC null-terminated strings vs. strings with length Sebastian Egner
03 Jan 2004 16:12 UTC Re: Couple things... Michael Sperber
03 Jan 2004 16:16 UTC Re: non-local exits are icky Michael Sperber
03 Jan 2004 19:42 UTC Re: Couple things... bear
03 Jan 2004 19:54 UTC Re: Couple things... Michael Sperber
04 Jan 2004 01:16 UTC Re: no constants please Tom Lord
04 Jan 2004 01:19 UTC Re: non-local exits are icky Tom Lord
04 Jan 2004 18:09 UTC Re: no constants please Richard Kelsey
04 Jan 2004 18:45 UTC Re: Couple things... felix
04 Jan 2004 18:53 UTC Re: Couple things... felix
04 Jan 2004 19:28 UTC Re: no constants please felix
04 Jan 2004 20:06 UTC Re: no constants please Richard Kelsey
04 Jan 2004 21:39 UTC Re: no constants please Tom Lord
04 Jan 2004 22:09 UTC Re: no constants please Tom Lord
04 Jan 2004 22:39 UTC Re: Couple things... Tom Lord
04 Jan 2004 22:58 UTC Re: no constants please Richard Kelsey
05 Jan 2004 01:16 UTC Re: no constants please Tom Lord
05 Jan 2004 01:21 UTC I don't believe in "(may GC)" Tom Lord
05 Jan 2004 01:31 UTC Re: no constants please Tom Lord
05 Jan 2004 01:38 UTC Re: no constants please Tom Lord
05 Jan 2004 01:45 UTC Re: no constants please Tom Lord
05 Jan 2004 11:40 UTC Re: no constants please Richard Kelsey
05 Jan 2004 12:06 UTC Re: I don't believe in "(may GC)" Richard Kelsey
05 Jan 2004 12:16 UTC Re: no constants please Richard Kelsey
05 Jan 2004 12:27 UTC Re: null-terminated strings vs. strings with length Richard Kelsey
05 Jan 2004 12:45 UTC Re: I don't believe in "(may GC)" Shiro Kawai
05 Jan 2004 16:51 UTC Re: no constants please Tom Lord
05 Jan 2004 17:00 UTC Re: I don't believe in "(may GC)" Tom Lord
05 Jan 2004 17:48 UTC Re: no constants please Richard Kelsey
05 Jan 2004 17:53 UTC Re: I don't believe in "(may GC)" bear
05 Jan 2004 18:05 UTC Re: no constants please Tom Lord
05 Jan 2004 18:16 UTC Re: I don't believe in "(may GC)" bear
05 Jan 2004 18:48 UTC Re: no constants please Michael Sperber
05 Jan 2004 18:50 UTC Re: no constants please Tom Lord
05 Jan 2004 19:03 UTC Re: no constants please Michael Sperber
05 Jan 2004 19:17 UTC Re: Couple things... Michael Sperber
05 Jan 2004 19:19 UTC Re: Couple things... Michael Sperber
05 Jan 2004 22:14 UTC Pika-style from first principles Tom Lord
05 Jan 2004 22:19 UTC Re: Couple things... Tom Lord
05 Jan 2004 22:26 UTC Re: no constants please Tom Lord
06 Jan 2004 01:37 UTC Re: no constants please tb@xxxxxx
06 Jan 2004 01:39 UTC Re: I don't believe in "(may GC)" tb@xxxxxx
06 Jan 2004 02:14 UTC Re: no constants please Richard Kelsey
06 Jan 2004 02:31 UTC Re: no constants please tb@xxxxxx
06 Jan 2004 02:55 UTC Re: no constants please Tom Lord
06 Jan 2004 03:09 UTC Re: no constants please Richard Kelsey
06 Jan 2004 03:14 UTC Re: no constants please tb@xxxxxx
06 Jan 2004 04:32 UTC Re: no constants please Tom Lord
06 Jan 2004 06:59 UTC Performance Felix Winkelmann
06 Jan 2004 07:15 UTC Portability Felix Winkelmann
06 Jan 2004 07:23 UTC Re: Portability Felix Winkelmann
06 Jan 2004 07:23 UTC Restrictions Felix Winkelmann
06 Jan 2004 07:35 UTC Re: Restrictions Michael Sperber
06 Jan 2004 07:39 UTC Re: I don't believe in "(may GC)" Michael Sperber
06 Jan 2004 07:42 UTC Re: no constants please Michael Sperber
06 Jan 2004 07:48 UTC Re: Restrictions Felix Winkelmann
06 Jan 2004 07:55 UTC Re: I don't believe in "(may GC)" Felix Winkelmann
06 Jan 2004 08:02 UTC Reliability Felix Winkelmann
06 Jan 2004 09:22 UTC Re: I don't believe in "(may GC)" Michael Sperber
06 Jan 2004 09:24 UTC Re: Restrictions Michael Sperber
06 Jan 2004 09:51 UTC Re: Restrictions Felix Winkelmann
06 Jan 2004 09:56 UTC Re: I don't believe in "(may GC)" Felix Winkelmann
06 Jan 2004 10:24 UTC Re: I don't believe in "(may GC)" Michael Sperber
06 Jan 2004 10:37 UTC Re: Restrictions Michael Sperber
06 Jan 2004 10:46 UTC Re: I don't believe in "(may GC)" Felix Winkelmann
06 Jan 2004 10:56 UTC A note on process Michael Sperber
06 Jan 2004 10:57 UTC Re: Restrictions Felix Winkelmann
06 Jan 2004 11:25 UTC Re: A note on process Felix Winkelmann
06 Jan 2004 11:41 UTC Re: A note on process Michael Sperber
06 Jan 2004 12:36 UTC Re: A note on process Felix Winkelmann
06 Jan 2004 13:10 UTC Re: A note on process Michael Sperber
06 Jan 2004 13:18 UTC Re: A note on process Felix Winkelmann
06 Jan 2004 15:36 UTC Re: Pika-style from first principles Marc Feeley
06 Jan 2004 16:25 UTC scheme_lookup_imported_binding David Van Horn
06 Jan 2004 16:40 UTC Re: I don't believe in "(may GC)" Tom Lord
06 Jan 2004 17:25 UTC Re: no constants please Tom Lord
06 Jan 2004 18:07 UTC Re: I don't believe in "(may GC)" tb@xxxxxx
06 Jan 2004 18:51 UTC Re: I don't believe in "(may GC)" bear
06 Jan 2004 19:52 UTC Re: no constants please Michael Sperber
06 Jan 2004 20:00 UTC Re: Pika-style from first principles Michael Sperber
06 Jan 2004 20:36 UTC Re: Couple things... Michael Sperber
06 Jan 2004 21:58 UTC Re: A note on process Tom Lord
07 Jan 2004 00:54 UTC Re: no constants please Tom Lord
07 Jan 2004 05:47 UTC Re: Pika-style from first principles Marc Feeley
07 Jan 2004 21:16 UTC Re: Pika-style from first principles Michael Sperber
07 Jan 2004 22:01 UTC when GC is permitted Jim Blandy
07 Jan 2004 22:18 UTC Re: I don't believe in "(may GC)" Jim Blandy
07 Jan 2004 22:33 UTC Re: when GC is permitted Richard Kelsey
07 Jan 2004 23:14 UTC Re: when GC is permitted Tom Lord
08 Jan 2004 01:35 UTC Re: when GC is permitted Jim Blandy
08 Jan 2004 01:43 UTC Re: when GC is permitted Jim Blandy
08 Jan 2004 04:21 UTC Re: when GC is permitted Tom Lord
08 Jan 2004 07:33 UTC Re: when GC is permitted Felix Winkelmann
08 Jan 2004 08:09 UTC Re: Strings/chars Jim Blandy
08 Jan 2004 08:25 UTC Re: Couple things... Jim Blandy
08 Jan 2004 08:34 UTC Re: when GC is permitted Jim Blandy
08 Jan 2004 08:58 UTC Re: when GC is permitted Felix Winkelmann
08 Jan 2004 09:45 UTC Re: Strings/chars Shiro Kawai
08 Jan 2004 16:56 UTC Re: Couple things... bear
08 Jan 2004 17:32 UTC Re: when GC is permitted Tom Lord
08 Jan 2004 19:05 UTC Re: when GC is permitted Jim Blandy
08 Jan 2004 19:37 UTC Re: when GC is permitted Jim Blandy
08 Jan 2004 19:46 UTC Re: Strings/chars Jim Blandy
08 Jan 2004 19:47 UTC Re: when GC is permitted Tom Lord
08 Jan 2004 19:51 UTC Re: Couple things... Jim Blandy
08 Jan 2004 20:01 UTC Re: when GC is permitted Richard Kelsey
08 Jan 2004 20:36 UTC Re: when GC is permitted Tom Lord
08 Jan 2004 21:01 UTC Re: Couple things... Tom Lord
08 Jan 2004 21:13 UTC Re: Pika-style from first principles Marc Feeley
08 Jan 2004 21:58 UTC Re: when GC is permitted Tom Lord
08 Jan 2004 21:59 UTC Re: Strings/chars Shiro Kawai
08 Jan 2004 22:08 UTC Re: Couple things... tb@xxxxxx
08 Jan 2004 22:16 UTC Re: Strings/chars tb@xxxxxx
08 Jan 2004 22:45 UTC Re: when GC is permitted Jim Blandy
08 Jan 2004 22:58 UTC Re: when GC is permitted Jim Blandy
08 Jan 2004 23:04 UTC Re: Strings/chars Jim Blandy
08 Jan 2004 23:28 UTC Re: Strings/chars tb@xxxxxx
09 Jan 2004 00:06 UTC Re: when GC is permitted Tom Lord
09 Jan 2004 05:06 UTC Re: Couple things... bear
09 Jan 2004 06:42 UTC Re: when GC is permitted Felix Winkelmann
09 Jan 2004 15:04 UTC Re: when GC is permitted Richard Kelsey
09 Jan 2004 18:08 UTC Re: Couple things... Bradd W. Szonye
09 Jan 2004 23:30 UTC Oh. Jim Blandy
10 Jan 2004 00:01 UTC Re: Couple things... bear
10 Jan 2004 15:40 UTC Re: when GC is permitted Matthew Dempsky
10 Jan 2004 16:00 UTC Re: Pika-style from first principles Michael Sperber
10 Jan 2004 16:37 UTC Re: Pika-style from first principles Marc Feeley
10 Jan 2004 18:13 UTC Re: Pika-style from first principles Michael Sperber
10 Jan 2004 18:57 UTC Re: when GC is permitted Tom Lord
10 Jan 2004 20:18 UTC Re: when GC is permitted Michael Sperber
10 Jan 2004 20:44 UTC Re: Pika-style from first principles Marc Feeley
10 Jan 2004 21:14 UTC Re: when GC is permitted Richard Kelsey
10 Jan 2004 21:30 UTC Re: when GC is permitted Marc Feeley
10 Jan 2004 21:48 UTC Re: when GC is permitted Tom Lord
10 Jan 2004 22:17 UTC Re: when GC is permitted Tom Lord
11 Jan 2004 03:10 UTC Re: when GC is permitted Matthew Dempsky
11 Jan 2004 03:52 UTC Re: when GC is permitted Matthew Dempsky
11 Jan 2004 09:58 UTC Re: when GC is permitted Michael Sperber
11 Jan 2004 10:40 UTC Re: when GC is permitted Matthew Dempsky
11 Jan 2004 12:14 UTC Re: when GC is permitted Michael Sperber
11 Jan 2004 17:05 UTC Re: when GC is permitted Tom Lord
11 Jan 2004 17:55 UTC Re: when GC is permitted Tom Lord
11 Jan 2004 23:37 UTC Re: when GC is permitted tb@xxxxxx
12 Jan 2004 01:07 UTC Re: when GC is permitted Richard Kelsey
12 Jan 2004 02:46 UTC Re: when GC is permitted tb@xxxxxx
12 Jan 2004 03:55 UTC Re: when GC is permitted Marc Feeley
12 Jan 2004 04:31 UTC Re: when GC is permitted felix
12 Jan 2004 04:37 UTC Re: Pika-style from first principles felix
12 Jan 2004 04:38 UTC Re: when GC is permitted felix
12 Jan 2004 14:32 UTC Re: when GC is permitted Matthew Dempsky
12 Jan 2004 21:13 UTC Re: when GC is permitted felix
12 Jan 2004 21:31 UTC temporarily withdrawing SRFI-50 Jim Blandy
12 Jan 2004 22:03 UTC Re: when GC is permitted Jim Blandy
12 Jan 2004 22:52 UTC Re: when GC is permitted felix
13 Jan 2004 01:23 UTC Re: when GC is permitted tb@xxxxxx
13 Jan 2004 01:25 UTC Re: temporarily withdrawing SRFI-50 tb@xxxxxx
13 Jan 2004 02:04 UTC Re: temporarily withdrawing SRFI-50 Tom Lord
13 Jan 2004 02:53 UTC Re: when GC is permitted Richard Kelsey
13 Jan 2004 03:20 UTC Re: when GC is permitted tb@xxxxxx
13 Jan 2004 06:16 UTC Re: when GC is permitted bear
13 Jan 2004 21:46 UTC Re: Pika-style from first principles Michael Sperber
14 Jan 2004 06:25 UTC Re: Pika-style from first principles Felix Winkelmann
14 Jan 2004 08:08 UTC Re: temporarily withdrawing SRFI-50 Jim Blandy
14 Jan 2004 09:06 UTC Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style Jim Blandy
14 Jan 2004 18:29 UTC Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style Per Bothner
14 Jan 2004 18:40 UTC Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style Tom Lord
14 Jan 2004 18:53 UTC Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style Tom Lord
14 Jan 2004 19:53 UTC Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style Jim Blandy
14 Jan 2004 20:28 UTC Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style Jim Blandy
14 Jan 2004 20:30 UTC Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style Jim Blandy
14 Jan 2004 20:45 UTC Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style Jim Blandy
14 Jan 2004 21:05 UTC Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style Tom Lord
14 Jan 2004 21:12 UTC Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style Tom Lord
14 Jan 2004 21:14 UTC Re: temporarily withdrawing SRFI-50 Michael Sperber
14 Jan 2004 21:21 UTC Re: when GC is permitted Michael Sperber
14 Jan 2004 21:22 UTC Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style Jim Blandy
14 Jan 2004 21:26 UTC Re: when GC is permitted Michael Sperber
14 Jan 2004 21:41 UTC Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style Tom Lord
14 Jan 2004 22:09 UTC Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style Tom Lord
14 Jan 2004 22:11 UTC Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style Jim Blandy
14 Jan 2004 22:18 UTC Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style Per Bothner
14 Jan 2004 23:16 UTC Re: when GC is permitted Tom Lord
14 Jan 2004 23:32 UTC Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style Tom Lord
14 Jan 2004 23:54 UTC Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style Jim Blandy
14 Jan 2004 23:55 UTC Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style bear
15 Jan 2004 00:30 UTC Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style Shiro Kawai
15 Jan 2004 00:30 UTC Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style Per Bothner
15 Jan 2004 01:07 UTC Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style bear
15 Jan 2004 01:26 UTC Re: when GC is permitted Benderjg@xxxxxx
15 Jan 2004 01:26 UTC Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style Per Bothner
15 Jan 2004 01:44 UTC Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style Shiro Kawai
15 Jan 2004 01:59 UTC Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style Tom Lord
15 Jan 2004 02:05 UTC Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style Tom Lord
15 Jan 2004 02:28 UTC Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style Shiro Kawai
15 Jan 2004 02:35 UTC Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style Tom Lord
15 Jan 2004 02:45 UTC Re: when GC is permitted Marc Feeley
15 Jan 2004 03:37 UTC Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style Tom Lord
15 Jan 2004 03:51 UTC Re: when GC is permitted Richard Kelsey
15 Jan 2004 08:42 UTC kind request for a sync() sebastian.egner@xxxxxx
15 Jan 2004 13:44 UTC Re: when GC is permitted Eric Knauel
15 Jan 2004 17:59 UTC Re: when GC is permitted Tom Lord
15 Jan 2004 18:04 UTC Re: when GC is permitted Tom Lord
17 Jan 2004 15:58 UTC Re: Couple things... Michael Sperber
18 Jan 2004 05:58 UTC Re: Couple things... bear
18 Jan 2004 10:18 UTC Re: Couple things... Michael Sperber
18 Jan 2004 16:21 UTC Re: Couple things... Tom Lord
18 Jan 2004 21:09 UTC Re: Couple things... bear
18 Jan 2004 21:53 UTC Re: Couple things... Tom Lord
19 Jan 2004 01:28 UTC Re: Couple things... bear
19 Jan 2004 02:59 UTC Re: Couple things... Tom Lord
22 Jan 2004 05:11 UTC strings draft Tom Lord
22 Jan 2004 09:46 UTC Re: strings draft Shiro Kawai
22 Jan 2004 17:45 UTC Re: strings draft Tom Lord
22 Jan 2004 19:05 UTC Re: strings draft bear
23 Jan 2004 02:06 UTC Re: strings draft Tom Lord
23 Jan 2004 02:09 UTC Re: strings draft tb@xxxxxx
23 Jan 2004 02:34 UTC Re: strings draft Alex Shinn
23 Jan 2004 02:42 UTC Re: strings draft Tom Lord
23 Jan 2004 02:42 UTC Re: strings draft tb@xxxxxx
23 Jan 2004 02:44 UTC Re: strings draft tb@xxxxxx
23 Jan 2004 02:48 UTC Re: strings draft Paul Schlie
23 Jan 2004 02:58 UTC Re: strings draft Alex Shinn
23 Jan 2004 03:02 UTC Re: strings draft Tom Lord
23 Jan 2004 03:04 UTC Re: strings draft tb@xxxxxx
23 Jan 2004 03:07 UTC Re: strings draft Tom Lord
23 Jan 2004 03:12 UTC Re: strings draft tb@xxxxxx
23 Jan 2004 03:13 UTC Re: strings draft tb@xxxxxx
23 Jan 2004 03:18 UTC Re: strings draft Alex Shinn
23 Jan 2004 03:28 UTC Re: strings draft Alex Shinn
23 Jan 2004 03:29 UTC Re: strings draft Tom Lord
23 Jan 2004 03:42 UTC Re: strings draft tb@xxxxxx
23 Jan 2004 03:44 UTC Re: strings draft tb@xxxxxx
23 Jan 2004 03:45 UTC Re: strings draft tb@xxxxxx
23 Jan 2004 05:03 UTC Re: strings draft Shiro Kawai
23 Jan 2004 06:00 UTC READ-OCTET (Re: strings draft) Shiro Kawai
23 Jan 2004 07:04 UTC Re: strings draft bear
23 Jan 2004 07:20 UTC Re: strings draft bear
23 Jan 2004 08:07 UTC Parsing Scheme [was Re: strings draft] Ken Dickey
23 Jan 2004 12:16 UTC Re: strings draft Paul Schlie
23 Jan 2004 12:53 UTC Re: Parsing Scheme [was Re: strings draft] Ken Dickey
23 Jan 2004 14:14 UTC Re: strings draft (musings) Paul Schlie
23 Jan 2004 17:55 UTC Re: Parsing Scheme [was Re: strings draft] bear
23 Jan 2004 18:48 UTC Re: strings draft tb@xxxxxx
23 Jan 2004 18:50 UTC Re: Parsing Scheme [was Re: strings draft] tb@xxxxxx
23 Jan 2004 18:52 UTC Re: strings draft tb@xxxxxx
23 Jan 2004 18:56 UTC Re: Parsing Scheme [was Re: strings draft] Per Bothner
23 Jan 2004 19:31 UTC Re: strings draft Bradd W. Szonye
23 Jan 2004 20:01 UTC Re: strings draft Matthew Dempsky
23 Jan 2004 20:20 UTC Re: Parsing Scheme [was Re: strings draft] Tom Lord
23 Jan 2004 20:39 UTC Re: Parsing Scheme [was Re: strings draft] Tom Lord
23 Jan 2004 20:57 UTC Re: Parsing Scheme [was Re: strings draft] Per Bothner
23 Jan 2004 21:22 UTC Re: Parsing Scheme [was Re: strings draft] tb@xxxxxx
23 Jan 2004 21:26 UTC Re: strings draft Paul Schlie
23 Jan 2004 21:57 UTC Re: Parsing Scheme [was Re: strings draft] Tom Lord
23 Jan 2004 22:52 UTC Re: Parsing Scheme [was Re: strings draft] Tom Lord
23 Jan 2004 23:35 UTC Re: Parsing Scheme [was Re: strings draft] Tom Lord
24 Jan 2004 00:15 UTC Re: strings draft Tom Lord
24 Jan 2004 00:45 UTC Re: strings draft Tom Lord
24 Jan 2004 02:21 UTC Re: strings draft bear
24 Jan 2004 03:26 UTC Re: strings draft Shiro Kawai
24 Jan 2004 04:31 UTC Re: strings draft Tom Lord
24 Jan 2004 04:49 UTC Re: strings draft Shiro Kawai
24 Jan 2004 06:48 UTC Re: Parsing Scheme [was Re: strings draft] tb@xxxxxx
24 Jan 2004 16:10 UTC Re: Parsing Scheme [was Re: strings draft] Ken Dickey
24 Jan 2004 18:55 UTC Re: Parsing Scheme [was Re: strings draft] Tom Lord
24 Jan 2004 19:01 UTC Re: strings draft Tom Lord
24 Jan 2004 19:34 UTC Re: Parsing Scheme [was Re: strings draft] tb@xxxxxx
24 Jan 2004 21:16 UTC Re: strings draft (premature, need first class type definition support first?) Paul Schlie
24 Jan 2004 22:02 UTC Re: Parsing Scheme [was Re: strings draft] Tom Lord
24 Jan 2004 22:15 UTC Re: strings draft Shiro Kawai
24 Jan 2004 22:17 UTC Re: strings draft (premature, need first class type definition support first?) Paul Schlie
24 Jan 2004 22:18 UTC Re: strings draft (premature, need first class type definition support first?) Tom Lord
25 Jan 2004 00:00 UTC Re: strings draft Matthew Dempsky
25 Jan 2004 03:14 UTC Re: Parsing Scheme [was Re: strings draft] Tom Lord
25 Jan 2004 07:29 UTC Re: strings draft Tom Lord
26 Jan 2004 01:58 UTC Re: strings draft Alex Shinn
26 Jan 2004 02:21 UTC Re: strings draft Alex Shinn
26 Jan 2004 02:35 UTC Re: strings draft bear
26 Jan 2004 02:35 UTC Re: strings draft Tom Lord
26 Jan 2004 03:00 UTC Re: strings draft Alex Shinn
26 Jan 2004 03:01 UTC Re: strings draft Tom Lord
26 Jan 2004 03:27 UTC Re: strings draft Tom Lord
26 Jan 2004 04:57 UTC Re: strings draft Shiro Kawai
26 Jan 2004 04:57 UTC Re: strings draft Alex Shinn
26 Jan 2004 09:58 UTC Octet vs Char (Re: strings draft) Shiro Kawai
26 Jan 2004 13:13 UTC Re: Octet vs Char (Re: strings draft) Matthew Dempsky
26 Jan 2004 13:41 UTC Re: Octet vs Char (Re: strings draft) Matthew Dempsky
26 Jan 2004 16:53 UTC Re: strings draft Matthew Dempsky
26 Jan 2004 19:04 UTC Re: Octet vs Char (Re: strings draft) bear
26 Jan 2004 19:40 UTC Re: Octet vs Char (Re: strings draft) Ken Dickey
26 Jan 2004 23:38 UTC Re: Octet vs Char Shiro Kawai
27 Jan 2004 00:34 UTC proposed srfi for extended character sets Tom Lord
27 Jan 2004 00:40 UTC Re: Octet vs Char (Re: strings draft) Paul Schlie
27 Jan 2004 00:44 UTC Re: strings draft Tom Lord
27 Jan 2004 05:10 UTC Re: Octet vs Char Shiro Kawai
27 Jan 2004 05:37 UTC Re: Octet vs Char Tom Lord
27 Jan 2004 06:50 UTC Re: Octet vs Char (Re: strings draft) Ken Dickey
27 Jan 2004 08:32 UTC Re: Octet vs Char (Re: strings draft) bear
27 Jan 2004 08:35 UTC Re: Octet vs Char bear
27 Jan 2004 19:06 UTC Re: Octet vs Char (Re: strings draft) bear
30 Jan 2004 21:12 UTC Strings, one last detail. bear
30 Jan 2004 21:29 UTC Clarification of SCHEME_GC_PROTECT/SCHEME_GC_UNPROTECT bear
30 Jan 2004 21:43 UTC Re: Strings, one last detail. Shiro Kawai
31 Jan 2004 00:27 UTC Re: Strings, one last detail. Tom Lord
31 Jan 2004 20:25 UTC Re: Strings, one last detail. bear
31 Jan 2004 20:56 UTC Re: Strings, one last detail. Tom Lord