Re: nested comments (please correct lexical scope) Paul Schlie 10 Jan 2005 23:07 UTC
So wonder if: {quote } => As opposed to an otherwise error/warning upon the evaluation of (quote )? > Sorry, last line should have been: > > (' #; <s-exp>) :: ({quote {remove <s-exp>}}) => ((quote )) ; empty quote > >> So in summary, it would seem that all reader actions invoked by a reader >> transform token should apply to the following correspondingly processed >> <s-exp>, implying: (showing only reader actions) >> >> (' ' <s-exp>) :: ({quote {quote <s-exp>}}) => ((quote (quote <s-exp>))) >> >> (#; #; <s-exp>) :: ({remove {remove <s-exp>}}) => () >> >> (#; ' <s-exp>) :: ({remove {quote <s-exp>}}) => () >> >> (' #; <s-exp>) :: ({quote {remove <s-exp>}}) => (') ; error, unbound 'quote > >