Thread Index - May 2005 - srfi-71@srfi.schemers.org

what about dropping rest-lists? Neil W. Van Dyke (16 May 2005 20:44 UTC)
Re: what about dropping rest-lists? felix winkelmann (17 May 2005 06:35 UTC)
Suggestion: nix VALUES in favor of DOT Alpha Petrofsky (16 May 2005 22:01 UTC)
Re: Suggestion: nix VALUES in favor of DOT Neil W. Van Dyke (16 May 2005 22:20 UTC)
Re: Suggestion: nix VALUES in favor of DOT Sebastian Egner (17 May 2005 08:43 UTC)
Re: what about dropping rest-lists? Sebastian Egner (17 May 2005 08:53 UTC)
Re: what about dropping rest-lists? Neil W. Van Dyke (17 May 2005 12:26 UTC)
Re: what about dropping rest-lists? Sebastian Egner (17 May 2005 11:59 UTC)
Re: what about dropping rest-lists? felix winkelmann (18 May 2005 05:19 UTC)
I like the idea Ulrich Hobelmann (17 May 2005 19:41 UTC)
Re: what about dropping rest-lists? Sebastian Egner (18 May 2005 08:36 UTC)
Re: what about dropping rest-lists? Sebastian Egner (18 May 2005 09:16 UTC)
Re: what about dropping rest-lists? Neil W. Van Dyke (18 May 2005 14:00 UTC)
Re: what about dropping rest-lists? Neil W. Van Dyke (18 May 2005 19:45 UTC)
Revision of SRFI 71 available Michael Sperber (18 May 2005 20:22 UTC)
Difference between values->list and list Christian Couder (18 May 2005 20:37 UTC)
Rest and patterns David Van Horn (18 May 2005 20:47 UTC)
Re: Rest and patterns Neil W. Van Dyke (18 May 2005 22:00 UTC)
How about dropping semi-variable-arity? Petrofsky, The Reverend Al (19 May 2005 02:01 UTC)
Re: Rest and patterns David Van Horn (19 May 2005 16:40 UTC)
Re: Rest and patterns Neil W. Van Dyke (19 May 2005 18:22 UTC)
Re: Difference between values->list and list Sebastian Egner (19 May 2005 07:44 UTC)
Re: Rest and patterns Sebastian Egner (19 May 2005 08:05 UTC)
Re: How about dropping semi-variable-arity? Sebastian Egner (19 May 2005 12:13 UTC)
Re: How about dropping semi-variable-arity? Neil W. Van Dyke (19 May 2005 14:36 UTC)
multiple-value set! Neil W. Van Dyke (20 May 2005 18:10 UTC)
Re: multiple-value set! Sebastian Egner (23 May 2005 13:29 UTC)