Discourse forum Lassi Kortela (26 Nov 2020 14:21 UTC)
Re: Discourse forum Arthur A. Gleckler (26 Nov 2020 16:23 UTC)
Re: Discourse forum Lassi Kortela (26 Nov 2020 16:25 UTC)
Re: Discourse forum Jeronimo Pellegrini (26 Nov 2020 16:28 UTC)
Re: Discourse forum Arthur A. Gleckler (26 Nov 2020 16:33 UTC)
Re: Discourse forum Alaric Snell-Pym (26 Nov 2020 16:40 UTC)
Re: Discourse forum Lassi Kortela (26 Nov 2020 16:44 UTC)
Re: Discourse forum Arthur A. Gleckler (26 Nov 2020 16:45 UTC)
Re: Discourse forum Lassi Kortela (26 Nov 2020 16:47 UTC)
Re: Discourse forum Arthur A. Gleckler (26 Nov 2020 16:58 UTC)
Re: Discourse forum Lassi Kortela (26 Nov 2020 17:10 UTC)
Re: Discourse forum Arthur A. Gleckler (26 Nov 2020 19:17 UTC)
Re: Discourse forum Lassi Kortela (26 Nov 2020 19:40 UTC)
Re: Discourse forum Alaric Snell-Pym (26 Nov 2020 17:44 UTC)
Re: Discourse forum Lassi Kortela (26 Nov 2020 19:38 UTC)

Re: Discourse forum Lassi Kortela 26 Nov 2020 19:38 UTC

> It might be an interesting project for an economist to find a way to
> quantify the preciousness of a Scheme.org subdomain (given they're not
> up for auction), but I think we can all agree there needs to be *some*
> bar set as to what gets given a domain and what doesn't, and we probably
> won't be able to agree on a written definition of where that bar is :-)
>
>  From my perspective, I think the biggest "value" at stake is real estate
> on the front page of scheme.org; if a subdomain points at a dead
> project, nobody will know unless they go looking under the covers, but a
> link to a dead project on the front page is poor.

Good point. Agreed that we should prune languishing subdomains from the
front page on some schedule.
<https://github.com/schemeorg/schemeorg/blob/master/projects.scm>
currently has a `display?` property for each project. If set to #f, the
project is hidden from the front page listing, but the DNS keeps working.

> Based purely on gut feel, I suggest that scheme.org subdomains be given to:
>
> 1) Any existing thing that meets the basic standards wrt. privacy and
> relevance to Scheme and so on, and is showing some community traction.
>
> 2) Any new thing that there's pretty broad consensus on the need for.
>
> Any proposed new thing that *doesn't* get broad consensus so is rejected
> by (2) isn't murdered by the tyranny of the vocal majority crushing
> innovation - it just needs to start on a non-scheme.org domain and prove
> its worth and thus become eligible under (1).
>
> Anything that dies can be removed from the list (and hence from the
> front page), but there should probably be some grace period between
> removal from the front page and removal from DNS, to allow for any
> remaining users to migrate away, while not pointing any new visitors at it.
>
> Converting those hand-wavy definitions of "some community traction" and
> "dies" and "pretty broad consensus" is left as an exercise for the reader.

All of those are good ideas.

Perhaps we could use sub-sub-domains for experimental stuff in some
cases. discourse.forum.scheme.org etc