Discourse forum
Lassi Kortela
(26 Nov 2020 14:21 UTC)
|
Re: Discourse forum
Arthur A. Gleckler
(26 Nov 2020 16:23 UTC)
|
Re: Discourse forum
Lassi Kortela
(26 Nov 2020 16:25 UTC)
|
Re: Discourse forum
Jeronimo Pellegrini
(26 Nov 2020 16:28 UTC)
|
Re: Discourse forum
Arthur A. Gleckler
(26 Nov 2020 16:33 UTC)
|
Re: Discourse forum
Alaric Snell-Pym
(26 Nov 2020 16:40 UTC)
|
Re: Discourse forum
Lassi Kortela
(26 Nov 2020 16:44 UTC)
|
Re: Discourse forum
Arthur A. Gleckler
(26 Nov 2020 16:45 UTC)
|
Re: Discourse forum
Lassi Kortela
(26 Nov 2020 16:47 UTC)
|
Re: Discourse forum
Arthur A. Gleckler
(26 Nov 2020 16:58 UTC)
|
Re: Discourse forum
Lassi Kortela
(26 Nov 2020 17:10 UTC)
|
Re: Discourse forum
Arthur A. Gleckler
(26 Nov 2020 19:17 UTC)
|
Re: Discourse forum
Lassi Kortela
(26 Nov 2020 19:40 UTC)
|
Re: Discourse forum
Alaric Snell-Pym
(26 Nov 2020 17:44 UTC)
|
Re: Discourse forum Lassi Kortela (26 Nov 2020 19:38 UTC)
|
> It might be an interesting project for an economist to find a way to > quantify the preciousness of a Scheme.org subdomain (given they're not > up for auction), but I think we can all agree there needs to be *some* > bar set as to what gets given a domain and what doesn't, and we probably > won't be able to agree on a written definition of where that bar is :-) > > From my perspective, I think the biggest "value" at stake is real estate > on the front page of scheme.org; if a subdomain points at a dead > project, nobody will know unless they go looking under the covers, but a > link to a dead project on the front page is poor. Good point. Agreed that we should prune languishing subdomains from the front page on some schedule. <https://github.com/schemeorg/schemeorg/blob/master/projects.scm> currently has a `display?` property for each project. If set to #f, the project is hidden from the front page listing, but the DNS keeps working. > Based purely on gut feel, I suggest that scheme.org subdomains be given to: > > 1) Any existing thing that meets the basic standards wrt. privacy and > relevance to Scheme and so on, and is showing some community traction. > > 2) Any new thing that there's pretty broad consensus on the need for. > > Any proposed new thing that *doesn't* get broad consensus so is rejected > by (2) isn't murdered by the tyranny of the vocal majority crushing > innovation - it just needs to start on a non-scheme.org domain and prove > its worth and thus become eligible under (1). > > Anything that dies can be removed from the list (and hence from the > front page), but there should probably be some grace period between > removal from the front page and removal from DNS, to allow for any > remaining users to migrate away, while not pointing any new visitors at it. > > Converting those hand-wavy definitions of "some community traction" and > "dies" and "pretty broad consensus" is left as an exercise for the reader. All of those are good ideas. Perhaps we could use sub-sub-domains for experimental stuff in some cases. discourse.forum.scheme.org etc