|
Who should maintain the RnRS subdomains? Lassi Kortela (27 Nov 2020 08:04 UTC)
|
|
Re: Who should maintain the RnRS subdomains?
Arthur A. Gleckler
(27 Nov 2020 16:12 UTC)
|
|
Re: Who should maintain the RnRS subdomains?
Alaric Snell-Pym
(27 Nov 2020 16:39 UTC)
|
|
Re: Who should maintain the RnRS subdomains?
Lassi Kortela
(27 Nov 2020 23:12 UTC)
|
|
Re: Who should maintain the RnRS subdomains?
Arthur A. Gleckler
(28 Nov 2020 03:08 UTC)
|
|
Re: Who should maintain the RnRS subdomains?
Lassi Kortela
(28 Nov 2020 20:21 UTC)
|
|
Re: Who should maintain the RnRS subdomains?
Arthur A. Gleckler
(28 Nov 2020 22:30 UTC)
|
|
Re: Who should maintain the RnRS subdomains?
Lassi Kortela
(28 Nov 2020 23:03 UTC)
|
|
Re: Who should maintain the RnRS subdomains?
Arthur A. Gleckler
(28 Nov 2020 23:23 UTC)
|
|
Re: Who should maintain the RnRS subdomains?
Alaric Snell-Pym
(29 Nov 2020 14:25 UTC)
|
|
Re: Who should maintain the RnRS subdomains?
Lassi Kortela
(29 Nov 2020 14:59 UTC)
|
|
Re: Who should maintain the RnRS subdomains?
Alaric Snell-Pym
(29 Nov 2020 15:17 UTC)
|
|
Re: Who should maintain the RnRS subdomains?
Lassi Kortela
(29 Nov 2020 15:37 UTC)
|
We currently have {r5rs,r6rs,r7rs}.scheme.org subdomains, all of which
redirect to more official websites for those standards. Those websites
are... better than nothing. Each is a white page listing the most
essential links, and that's basically it. R2RS, R3RS, R4RS don't have
any website at all.
Empirically, the situation is that the people who write RnRS standards
don't have time to maintain web pages for the standards. Hence, I
suggest that rNrs.scheme.org be community subdomains like doc. Thoughts?