What about moving staging.scheme.org to production? Amirouche (21 May 2021 09:53 UTC)
Re: What about moving staging.scheme.org to production? Lassi Kortela (21 May 2021 10:17 UTC)
Re: What about moving staging.scheme.org to production? Arthur A. Gleckler (24 May 2021 02:58 UTC)
Re: What about moving staging.scheme.org to production? Lassi Kortela (24 May 2021 11:52 UTC)
Re: What about moving staging.scheme.org to production? Jakub T. Jankiewicz (24 May 2021 12:05 UTC)
Re: What about moving staging.scheme.org to production? Lassi Kortela (24 May 2021 12:14 UTC)

Re: What about moving staging.scheme.org to production? Jakub T. Jankiewicz 24 May 2021 12:05 UTC

On Mon, 24 May 2021 14:52:22 +0300
Lassi Kortela <xxxxxx@lassi.io> wrote:

> > I just ran a speed test, and it looks like we need to do some work
> > before we're ready for Hacker News:
> >
> >     https://webpagetest.org/result/210524_AiDcRN_d2e289be2ef7415f5c3992ac6029a17e/
> >
>
> I turned on gzip compression, and added a caching header to say that our
> pages expire in 1 month. Now the test gives an A grade for everything.
>
> "Compress images" and "CDN" are N/A, which is probably right for us.

I was testing in lighthouse (if you open Google Chrome dev tools it's last
tab, to open dev tools press F12). The stats shows:

Performance 100
Accessibility 94
Best Practices 100
SEO 89

SEO is low because there are no meta description in head.

Accessibility because of low contrast of grey date in "What's new in Scheme"
section.

--
Jakub T. Jankiewicz, Web Developer
https://jcubic.pl/me