RDBMS data types and NULL representation
Peter Bex
(11 Sep 2019 08:08 UTC)
|
Re: RDBMS data types and NULL representation
Lassi Kortela
(11 Sep 2019 08:53 UTC)
|
Re: RDBMS data types and NULL representation
Peter Bex
(11 Sep 2019 09:30 UTC)
|
Partitioning the persistence problem space
hga@xxxxxx
(12 Sep 2019 12:29 UTC)
|
Re: Partitioning the persistence problem space
Peter Bex
(12 Sep 2019 12:45 UTC)
|
Re: Partitioning the persistence problem space hga@xxxxxx (12 Sep 2019 13:13 UTC)
|
Re: Partitioning the persistence problem space
John Cowan
(14 Sep 2019 03:59 UTC)
|
Re: Partitioning the persistence problem space hga@xxxxxx 12 Sep 2019 13:12 UTC
Quick reply on the issue of statement performance: > From: Peter Bex <xxxxxx@more-magic.net> > Date: Thursday, September 12, 2019 7:45 AM > On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 07:29:17AM -0500, xxxxxx@ancell-ent.com wrote: >> Hiding the concept of prepared statements... > In the postgresql egg: > > (row-values (query conn "SELECT $1, $2" "hi" "there")) => ("hi" "there") > > This is sent in one roundtrip to the database without the use of an > intermediate prepared statement. > > The freetds egg[2] which I co-wrote also does this, but it > implements it via a hidden prepared statement. That egg does not > provide a way to create prepared statements directly. That's > possibly an oversight because creating prepared statements and > executing them more often can be a performance benefit (it avoids > parsing the SQL over and over). > > I don't know how often this is needed or how big of a benefit it > really is, though.... I'm under the impression this is less important today because systems are so much more capable, and long prior to that databases like the portable version of DB2 introduced caching than can to some degree alleviate having to repeat parsing and planning. > [...] > [2] https://wiki.call-cc.org/eggref/4/freetds - Harold