Re: State of Scheme in the Browser

Show/hide message thread

Re: State of Scheme in the Browser Lassi Kortela (31 Jul 2019 16:36 UTC)

Re: State of Scheme in the Browser John Cowan (31 Jul 2019 18:46 UTC)

Re: State of Scheme in the Browser Lassi Kortela (31 Jul 2019 18:55 UTC)

Re: State of Scheme in the Browser John Cowan (31 Jul 2019 19:20 UTC)

Re: State of Scheme in the Browser Lassi Kortela (31 Jul 2019 20:14 UTC)

Re: State of Scheme in the Browser Amirouche Boubekki (31 Jul 2019 20:49 UTC)

Re: State of Scheme in the Browser John Cowan (31 Jul 2019 20:51 UTC)

Re: State of Scheme in the Browser Lassi Kortela (31 Jul 2019 20:55 UTC)

Re: State of Scheme in the Browser John Cowan (31 Jul 2019 21:00 UTC)

Re: State of Scheme in the Browser Lassi Kortela (31 Jul 2019 21:21 UTC)

Re: State of Scheme in the Browser John Cowan (31 Jul 2019 22:03 UTC)

Re: State of Scheme in the Browser Lassi Kortela (01 Aug 2019 09:40 UTC)

Re: State of Scheme in the Browser Amirouche Boubekki (01 Aug 2019 11:25 UTC)

Re: State of Scheme in the Browser John Cowan (01 Aug 2019 14:18 UTC)

Re: State of Scheme in the Browser Lassi Kortela (02 Aug 2019 10:24 UTC)

Re: State of Scheme in the Browser Amirouche Boubekki (02 Aug 2019 19:19 UTC)

Re: State of Scheme in the Browser Lassi Kortela (02 Aug 2019 20:42 UTC)

Re: State of Scheme in the Browser Arthur A. Gleckler (02 Aug 2019 00:55 UTC)

Re: State of Scheme in the Browser John Cowan (02 Aug 2019 01:17 UTC)

Re: State of Scheme in the Browser Arthur A. Gleckler (02 Aug 2019 01:28 UTC)

Re: State of Scheme in the Browser John Cowan (02 Aug 2019 02:28 UTC)

Re: State of Scheme in the Browser Lassi Kortela (01 Aug 2019 09:48 UTC)

Re: State of Scheme in the Browser Lassi Kortela 31 Jul 2019 18:55 UTC

>     Would it be worth specifying a version of Scheme without tail calls and
>     continuations (I know..) that maps easily to JavaScript?
>
> A possible place to start is
> <https://bitbucket.org/cowan/r7rs-wg1-infra/src/default/BottomScheme.md>, which
> is only a spec at present (you can ignore the implementation section).
> You could add things to it.

That's is very cool! I had forgotten you wrote this.

Another point of comparison is Pre-Scheme. The people who worked with it
apparently said it was good to use. Currently it lives in the Scheme 48
source tree, not sure if there's any formal document about it.

I don't have time to work on these myself, but I will enthusiastically
promote any project that does :)