|
Re: State of Scheme in the Browser
Lassi Kortela
(31 Jul 2019 16:36 UTC)
|
|
Re: State of Scheme in the Browser
John Cowan
(31 Jul 2019 18:46 UTC)
|
|
Re: State of Scheme in the Browser
Lassi Kortela
(31 Jul 2019 18:55 UTC)
|
|
Re: State of Scheme in the Browser
John Cowan
(31 Jul 2019 19:20 UTC)
|
|
Re: State of Scheme in the Browser
Lassi Kortela
(31 Jul 2019 20:14 UTC)
|
|
Re: State of Scheme in the Browser Amirouche Boubekki (31 Jul 2019 20:49 UTC)
|
|
Re: State of Scheme in the Browser
John Cowan
(31 Jul 2019 20:51 UTC)
|
|
Re: State of Scheme in the Browser
Lassi Kortela
(31 Jul 2019 20:55 UTC)
|
|
Re: State of Scheme in the Browser
John Cowan
(31 Jul 2019 21:00 UTC)
|
|
Re: State of Scheme in the Browser
Lassi Kortela
(31 Jul 2019 21:21 UTC)
|
|
Re: State of Scheme in the Browser
John Cowan
(31 Jul 2019 22:03 UTC)
|
|
Re: State of Scheme in the Browser
Lassi Kortela
(01 Aug 2019 09:40 UTC)
|
|
Re: State of Scheme in the Browser
Amirouche Boubekki
(01 Aug 2019 11:25 UTC)
|
|
Re: State of Scheme in the Browser
John Cowan
(01 Aug 2019 14:18 UTC)
|
|
Re: State of Scheme in the Browser
Lassi Kortela
(02 Aug 2019 10:24 UTC)
|
|
Re: State of Scheme in the Browser
Amirouche Boubekki
(02 Aug 2019 19:19 UTC)
|
|
Re: State of Scheme in the Browser
Lassi Kortela
(02 Aug 2019 20:42 UTC)
|
|
Re: State of Scheme in the Browser
Arthur A. Gleckler
(02 Aug 2019 00:55 UTC)
|
|
Re: State of Scheme in the Browser
John Cowan
(02 Aug 2019 01:17 UTC)
|
|
Re: State of Scheme in the Browser
Arthur A. Gleckler
(02 Aug 2019 01:28 UTC)
|
|
Re: State of Scheme in the Browser
John Cowan
(02 Aug 2019 02:28 UTC)
|
|
Re: State of Scheme in the Browser
Lassi Kortela
(01 Aug 2019 09:48 UTC)
|
Le mer. 31 juil. 2019 à 20:46, John Cowan <xxxxxx@ccil.org> a écrit : > > > > On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 12:36 PM Lassi Kortela <xxxxxx@lassi.io> wrote: > >> Would it be worth specifying a version of Scheme without tail calls and >> continuations (I know..) that maps easily to JavaScript? > > > A possible place to start is <https://bitbucket.org/cowan/r7rs-wg1-infra/src/default/BottomScheme.md>, which is only a spec at present (you can ignore the implementation section). You could add things to it. > A subset of Scheme that does not have at least delimited continuation is a step backward as it would require the developer to rely on callback-based code.
