Re: Argument order of = equivalence predicates Donovan Kolbly 18 Feb 1999 22:29 UTC
On Thu, 18 Feb 1999, Olin Shivers wrote:
> [...] As I spell out in careful
> detail in the topic's new text, you can *usefully* (not even pathologicaly)
> use a function like <. So I should call it a "comparison" function. How's
> But I'm tempted to leave the parameter named "=" since it's short & convenient.
> "CMP" or "COMPARE" seems more awkward.
I think Dylan uses "test", which is short and fairly explicit. Of course,
for them its a keyword.
-- Donovan Kolbly ( RScheme Development Group