To quote or not to quote, that is the question David Van Horn (18 Sep 2009 20:48 UTC)
Re: To quote or not to quote, that is the question Alexey Radul (19 Sep 2009 03:33 UTC)
Re: To quote or not to quote, that is the question David Van Horn (19 Sep 2009 13:23 UTC)
Re: To quote or not to quote, that is the question Robby Findler (19 Sep 2009 13:34 UTC)
Re: To quote or not to quote, that is the question David Van Horn (19 Sep 2009 13:49 UTC)
Re: To quote or not to quote, that is the question Shiro Kawai (19 Sep 2009 14:11 UTC)
Re: To quote or not to quote, that is the question David Van Horn (19 Sep 2009 16:04 UTC)

To quote or not to quote, that is the question David Van Horn 18 Sep 2009 20:48 UTC

It is not possible to define a correct implementation of `quote' which
produces random-access pairs as a library form, so I could not provide a
portable reference implementation if this feature was added.  On the
other hand, it seems useful to have such a form.  Which do people
prefer: portability of the reference implementation or utility of the
specification?  They seem to be at odds in this case.

David