To quote or not to quote, that is the question David Van Horn (18 Sep 2009 20:48 UTC)
Re: To quote or not to quote, that is the question Alexey Radul (19 Sep 2009 03:33 UTC)
Re: To quote or not to quote, that is the question David Van Horn (19 Sep 2009 13:23 UTC)
Re: To quote or not to quote, that is the question Robby Findler (19 Sep 2009 13:34 UTC)
Re: To quote or not to quote, that is the question David Van Horn (19 Sep 2009 13:49 UTC)
Re: To quote or not to quote, that is the question Shiro Kawai (19 Sep 2009 14:11 UTC)
Re: To quote or not to quote, that is the question David Van Horn (19 Sep 2009 16:04 UTC)

Re: To quote or not to quote, that is the question Alexey Radul 19 Sep 2009 03:26 UTC

On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 4:48 PM, David Van Horn
<xxxxxx@cs.brandeis.edu> wrote:
> It is not possible to define a correct implementation of `quote' which
> produces random-access pairs as a library form

This may be a stupid question: why not define random-access-quote to
use the standard quote and convert the result into a random-access
list?  (This may involve recurring inside the elements of literal
vectors, but so be it).

~Alexey