Final comments, mostly editorial John Cowan (27 Nov 2013 23:59 UTC)
|
Re: Final comments, mostly editorial
Per Bothner
(28 Nov 2013 03:52 UTC)
|
Re: Final comments, mostly editorial
John Cowan
(28 Nov 2013 04:07 UTC)
|
Re: Final comments, mostly editorial
John Cowan
(28 Nov 2013 04:10 UTC)
|
Re: Final comments, mostly editorial
Per Bothner
(28 Nov 2013 04:46 UTC)
|
Re: Final comments, mostly editorial
John Cowan
(28 Nov 2013 04:51 UTC)
|
Re: Final comments, mostly editorial
Per Bothner
(07 Dec 2013 01:24 UTC)
|
Re: Final comments, mostly editorial
John Cowan
(07 Dec 2013 19:24 UTC)
|
Re: Final comments, mostly editorial
Per Bothner
(08 Dec 2013 08:37 UTC)
|
Re: Final comments, mostly editorial
John Cowan
(08 Dec 2013 17:13 UTC)
|
Re: Final comments, mostly editorial
Per Bothner
(08 Dec 2013 20:27 UTC)
|
Re: Final comments, mostly editorial
John Cowan
(08 Dec 2013 23:23 UTC)
|
1) For "process-instructions and properties" read "processing instructions and DTD properties". 2) For "processing-instructions" read "processing instructions". 3) For "leave out the ending tag" (twice) read "leave out the name in the end-tag". 4) (Substantive). > must be escaped in character content iff it is preceded by ]]; this is an XML well-formedness requirement. 5) for "a xml-true-attribute" read "an xml-true-attribute". 6) for "4 integers" read "four integers". 7) For "ending tag" and "end tag" read "end-tag". 8) For "Element (tag) names" read "Element names" 9) For "looks like standard" read "looks like a standard" 10) For "compute the element tag" read "compute the name in the start-tag". 11) For "simple (unprefixed) element tags" read "unprefixed element names". -- John Cowan http://ccil.org/~cowan xxxxxx@ccil.org Economists were put on this planet to make astrologers look good. --Leo McGarry