Final comments, mostly editorial
John Cowan
(27 Nov 2013 23:59 UTC)
|
Re: Final comments, mostly editorial Per Bothner (28 Nov 2013 03:52 UTC)
|
Re: Final comments, mostly editorial
John Cowan
(28 Nov 2013 04:07 UTC)
|
Re: Final comments, mostly editorial
John Cowan
(28 Nov 2013 04:10 UTC)
|
Re: Final comments, mostly editorial
Per Bothner
(28 Nov 2013 04:46 UTC)
|
Re: Final comments, mostly editorial
John Cowan
(28 Nov 2013 04:51 UTC)
|
Re: Final comments, mostly editorial
Per Bothner
(07 Dec 2013 01:24 UTC)
|
Re: Final comments, mostly editorial
John Cowan
(07 Dec 2013 19:24 UTC)
|
Re: Final comments, mostly editorial
Per Bothner
(08 Dec 2013 08:37 UTC)
|
Re: Final comments, mostly editorial
John Cowan
(08 Dec 2013 17:13 UTC)
|
Re: Final comments, mostly editorial
Per Bothner
(08 Dec 2013 20:27 UTC)
|
Re: Final comments, mostly editorial
John Cowan
(08 Dec 2013 23:23 UTC)
|
Thank - I've applied the editorial comments, but I have a question about: On 11/27/2013 03:59 PM, John Cowan wrote: > 4) (Substantive). > must be escaped in character content iff it > is preceded by ]]; this is an XML well-formedness requirement. My reading of the XML specification is this is for the sake of SGML compatibility, which no-one cares about any more ... Note SRFI-107 is not a specification of XML documents or XML parsers. It is an *XML-like* syntax for embedding in S-expressions. As such, why should an "SRFI-107 processor" enforce an arbitrary constraint that ">" must be escaped when following "]]" when not in a CDATA section? That's just a pointless extra rule. -- --Per Bothner xxxxxx@bothner.com http://per.bothner.com/